Page:Delineation of Roman Catholicism.djvu/19

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

(1.) The Jews read th?m 71 (2.) The New Testament enjoins it 72 (3.) The primitiveOhristimmr? them 7?

3. Arguments erainet the ]?man

Cat]?olic restriction on Scripture reading 7? (1.) Their p?,vabrmis arregant end absurd 73 q?.) Their r?Jfr?n amounts to & prohibition 73 (:30 They are o-?poftd to the word of God 74 They have barely ? not lpr? for their circulation 74 They refused to perudt the Brit- ish Bible Society toft:irculate the Douay Bible 7� Theyare against its tireelation, which is proved by f?u ?4,7�o analogy between the proeeed- iago of the Bible Society and the Church of l?me 75 (4.) Their people not allowed to exercise their judgment in reading Scripture 75 Creed of Plus IV. cited Dr. Milner quoted And Gather 78 (5.) They do not instruct their people to read 78 Milner quoted 73 VII. Their ?��?w?* ? teeing ,tated ?nd ,,n,n?r?d !. Ohj., "The Sct/l?Ure is wr?d by ?ome to their desu-action" 77, 78 $. Obj., "FanaQcism re?l? from premi?cuo? reading" 78, 70 3. Obj., "It producse hereales"79 Features of resemblance between Romanism and Socinbnism Fir, t. The Soch3ian does not edopt the Protestant rule, nor is he a Protestant 80 ,8*?o?/?y. The divinity of Chrbt can be ,?]?oved from Scripture 80 7?rd?y. rhere are strunf fea- tures of resemblance between Romanism and Socinisnism 81 (1.) In doctrine 81 (S.) In the liberties taken with Scripture 81 (9.) In the rules of interl)ret?tion 81 (4.) Yet ?oc'mhns ?ndRoman- ists are to be distinguished 82 4. Obj., - Scripture ? produces schism" 82 8. Obj., "It produces disloyalty.' subordination, and rebellion" %?, 83 6. Obj., "It does more harm than 7. j?., '"'Christ sad Im al?tbs did 80 11 not prepa?te the gMpel by writing, but by teaching" 83, 84 VIII. T/? canon of $cript?e 84, 85 1. The Protestants have the same canon of the Old Testament with the Jews 2?. The a])ocry?a was 11ot added to the C!ffmtian canon during the first four centuries of Christianity 85, 86

3. Five reasons against the canonical-

nesn of the apocrypha 86 4. Their introduction into the canon of modern date 86, 87 IX. Got*d?s,, m??, n,irio, 87 1. Remarks on tradition and church authority 87 ?. The genuineness of.Scripture 87, 88 �Its authenticity 88, 89 4. Its inspiration 89, 90 The best scholars extol it 90 The Douey Bible formed upon it 90 The Scriptures were translated among the primitive Christians 91 XI. J?.?,'t ? t? C/mrcA of J?,,,?, AotA in re?r? to fr,,?r the or/g/ha/ 91 1. They treat with cli?esp?ct the ori- ginal, by la'e?rring the Vulgate ?-. The �ulgat? examlned

3. The Douay Bible 92, 93

4. Their note, on it 99, 94 5. They have not issued the original Scriptures 94 the reeord,?f the Ctutrck of t/san of 8?ipt=re 94 Difficulties of their plan 94, Facilities of the Protestant way 94, CHAPTER HI. TstaDx?ot? 9? I. TAz/r d?tr/nz dz. fo? ? Counc? of Trent quo? ? B?op Hay qu? ? ? ?. M?er ? Pmt?t?t views of ? 96, 97 1. ?6pt?l u? of t? w? ? 2. ?e t?tions appmv? of in men 97, ? 3. ? ?t th? ?live? by the a?tl? were ?t? ? ?ting ?, ? ?. ?e ? of the h?mp5' lo?e? w? ?11? ?t ? 5. ?e t?tio? of the Je? ?, 1? IlL ?? of ? C? ? R? Digitized by ?00?lC