Page:Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr.pdf/15

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 15 of 58

himself and Ramaswami, J.) - The seeds of the present controversy were sown as early as in 1946.

9. Existing paragraphs in the original text are broken up and separate paragraph numbers are given.

For example,
Existing paragraph broken up into two paragraphs and separate paragraph number added on application of editorial judgment.

Raw text obtained from Registry:

SCC Page:
“but the risk involved in sacrificing efficiency of administration must always be borne in mind when any State sets about making a provision for reservation of appointments of posts.” We see no justification to multiply ‘the risk,’ which would be the consequence of holding that reservation can be provided even in the matter of promotion.
“but the risk involved in sacrificing efficiency of administration must always be borne in mind when any State sets about making a provision for reservation of appointments or posts.” (SCR p.606)

828. We see no justification to multiply ‘the risk’, which would be the consequence of holding that reservation can be provided even in the matter of promotion.
weaker segments of We, the people of India. No other understanding can reconcile the claim of a radical present and hangover of the unjust past.” A similar view was expressed in Vasant Kumar by Chinnappa Reddy, J. The learned Judge said “the mere securing of high marks at an examination may not necessarily mark out a good administrator.

weaker segments of ‘We, the people of India’. No other understanding can=