Page:History of england froude.djvu/161

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
1528.]
THE FALL OF WOLSEY
139

puted legitimacy.[1] 1527–8.
Jan. 1.
Gardiner writes to Wolsey,[2] 'We did even more inculcate what speed and celerity the thing required, and what danger it was to the realm to have this matter hang in suspense. His Holiness confessed the same, and thereupon began 1528.
March 30.
to reckon what divers titles might be pretended by the King of Scots and others, and granted that, without an heir male, with provision to be made by consent of the State for his succession, and unless that what shall be done herein be established in such fashion as nothing may hereafter be objected thereto, the realm was like to come to dissolution.'

In stronger language the Cardinal-Governor of Bologna declared that 'he knew the gyze of England as well as few men did, and if the King should die without heirs male, he was sure it would cost two hundred thousand men's lives. Wherefore he thought, supposing his Grace should have no more children by the Queen, and that by taking of another wife he might have heirs male, the bringing to pass that matter, and by that to avoid the mischiefs afore written, he thought would deserve Heaven.'[3] Whatever doubt there might be, therefore, whether the original marriage with Catherine was legal, it was universally admitted that there was none about the national desirableness of the dissolution of it; and if the Pope had been free to judge only by the merits of the case, it is impossible to doubt that he
  1. Knight and Cassalis to Wolsey: Burnet's Collect., p. 12.
  2. Strype's Memorials, vol. i., Appendix, p. 66.
  3. Sir F. Bryan and Peter Yannes to Henry; State Papers, vol. vii. p. 144.