Page:Race Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 602).pdf/72

(c) where there is any conflict or inconsistency between any rules made under the provisions of this section and any rules made under the provisions of another section of this Ordinance, then those first-mentioned rules shall to the extent of that conflict or inconsistency, as the case may be, prevail over those second-mentioned rules.

(9) For the avoidance of doubt, it is hereby declared that no rule made in accordance with this section shall empower the Court to hear and determine any proceedings involving any claim beyond its jurisdiction.”.

District Court Equal Opportunities Rules

89. Interpretation

Rule 2 of the District Court Equal Opportunities Rules (Cap. 336 sub. leg. G) is amended, in the definition of “relevant Ordinance”—

(a) in paragraph (b), by repealing “or”;

(b) in paragraph (c), by adding “or” at the end;

(c) by adding—

“(d) the Race Discrimination Ordinance (29 of 2008);”.

90. Application of other rules

Rule 4 is amended by repealing “73C(8) and 73D(8)” and substituting “73C(8), 73D(8) and 73E(8)”.

Sex Discrimination Ordinance

91. Interpretation

(1) Section 2(1) of the Sex Discrimination Ordinance (Cap. 480) is amended—

(a) in the definition of “club”, by repealing everything after “purposes” and substituting “and which provides and maintains its facilities, in whole or in part, from the funds of the association;”;

(b) by repealing the definition of “estate agent” and substituting—

““estate agent” (地產代理) has the same meaning as in the Estate Agents Ordinance (Cap. 511);”;

(c) by adding—

““near relative” (近親), in relation to a person, means—