Page:Sacred Books of the East - Volume 42.djvu/26

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.


cious side of the holy texts, and naturally chooses the auspicious aspect of the Atharvan also. Its precise com- plement is 5at. Br. X, 5, 2, 20. Here, after correlating the adhvaryu-priests with the ya^na//, the -^/-andoga-priests with the saman, the bahvr//^as with the uktha (rik), the author presents yatu, 'sorcery,' and the yatuvida/^, 'those skilled in sorcery,' as representatives of the fourth Veda. The bhesha^a of the Atharvan passage, and the yatu of the present passage, make up together what is embraced in the name atharvahgirasa/^ (AV. X, 7, 20). Moreover, the Sam- hita exhibits a decided predilection, bordering on rigorous distinction, for associating the term ^ngirasa with aggressive witchcraft, or the practice of spells (krztya). Thus VIII, 5, 9, kr/tya ahgirasi'/^ ; X, i, 6, pratiKna ahgirasa// . . . pra- tUik kntya akr/tya-mun kr/tyakr/to <^ahi ; XII, 5, 52, adadanam ^hgirasi brahma.^am upa d^saya ; cf. also VI, 45, 3 = RV. X, 164, 4. In XI, 4, 16 (cf. also VIII, 7, 17) the distinction between Atharvanic and Ahgirasic plants appears again, not, however, in any connection which con- veys of necessity the contrast between 'holy' and 'witch- craft ' plants. But it may do so. This, it will be remem- bered, is made in Vait. Su. 5, 10 ; it formed the starting point for the present enquiry, and the chain of evidence extending through the Atharvanic and Brahmanical litera- ture seems thus to be linked. We may add finally that the late Parij-ish/a hymns, AV. XIX, 22 and 23, which are repeated in the tract entitled Vedavratasya^dej-anavidhi, Ath. Parii". 46, 9 and 10, deal with and state subdivisions of angirasa and atharva;/a-texts, each separately \ The statements are but faintly applicable to the existing redac- tions of the Atharvan, the ^aunakiya, and Paippalada- .yakhas ^, but we should be slow to condemn them as wholly apocryphal. The Gop. Br. I, i, 5 and 8 also narrates in its own style of unbridled Brahmanical fancy the separate creation by Brahman of the ^z'shis Atharvan and Ahgiras,

' angiras^nam adyai/i pa«,^anuvakai/i svaha (XIX, 22, i); sarvebhyo ifigirobhyo vidagawebhya/i svaha (XIX, 22, 18) ; a{ha.rva?iS.n3Lm katmrikebhya/i svi'ha XIX, 23, i).

- Cf. Weber, Lid. Stud. IV, 433 ff.

�� �