Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 1 Vol 7.djvu/272

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

270 STRANGE,

"3

5$, John (AshbBRNHam), 3d Baron, afterwards (1 7301, 1st Eaiu. op AsnBrmsmsr, She (/. untn. 8 Aug. 173?, in her 16th year. VI. 1732. 6. James (Stanley), Karl of Derby [1485], and Lord Stbahqk [16281, great uncle (te., mother'! paternal uncle), became in Aug. 1732, on the death of his said great niece, heir general of the said Barony, beicgneit br. to William George Richard, Pt.h E. iu. OP DKRBTand 3d Loud Stuanok, ahnvenamed He sue. his said br.. 5 Nov. 1702, as 10th Karl of Derby, becoming 8 Aug, 17:i2, 6th Lord Strange, as above mentioned. He d. s.p., 1 Feb. 1735/6, aged 71, wlirn the Earldom of Derby devolved on his cousin and h. nude, but the Barony of Strange, the Lordship of the Isle and Man, and much of his large estate, passed to the heir r/encral as below. For fuller particulars of him, see " Dkbby " Earldom, cr. 148.1, under the 10th Karl. VIL 1736. 7. James (Murray), Duke op Atholl, &c. [H,], ) fi «  also LtlRD STRaHOR, cousin and h., being 3d bat 2d surv. t, ot I John (Mtrra y), 1st Di'KE of Atiioi.i. [S.Ji who was s. anil ft. of John (MURRAY), I m 1st Mahqpess ok AtHoli.. by Amelia Sophia, da. of (whose issue, in 1737, j £ lieeanie sole heir to) James (Stani.kyi, 7th (XVIthl Euti. or DERBY and 1st I ^ Loud SthaSok (of the creation of 1628), abovenained. He was 6. about 1600, | yj and, according to an Act of Pari, of 171H, twe. (notwithstanding that his elder "a br., who d. uiira. 9 July 1746,, was then living) to the peerage [S ] on his father's iJt death, 14 Xov. 1724, aud the. linmnji of Stramjt [ K.] on the death 1 Feb. 1 73.Y6, I "f 5 of his said cousin. His claim to the said Barony having been allowed 21 Feb. he was sum. to the house, 14 March 173ti/7, sitting for 4 years till the gen. election of 1741), both as an English Baron , a )aud as a Scotch Hep. Peer. Herf. s.p.m.s 8 Jan. 1764, aged 73. VIII. 1764. & Charlotte, DucnEss of Athoi.l, j&e. [S.], saa jure BaBOKKSS Sthanof., only snrv. ila. and h. She, who was I about 1731, IB. 23 Oct. 1758, her lirst cousin, John (Mi'itn.w". 3d DllKF. of Atiioi.i. [8.], and inherited, as heir general, the Rarimy af Stranijt on Iier father's death, 8 Jan. 1764. Her husband d. 5 Nov. 177 I. aged 45. She rf. 13 Oct. 1 806, aged 71. Earldom. J inn! 9. .Ioiin (Murray), Dtjkx ok Atiioi.i,, kc I 1786 E^J ^' sl *" ' "® 1755 ; sue. his father in the peerage [S.j, 5 Nov. 1771- He. being at that time h. ap. to lu'< Barony. mother's Barony at Strnmie, was cr. IS Aug. 1786, BAttON IY laAr MURRAY OF STANLEY,'") co. Oloncester, and F.AIU, 1A. IbVO. STRANG E( c [0.8.]; on her death, 13 Oct, 1805, he became also LORD STRANGE [1628], He d. 20 Sep. 1S30, aged 75. J * Earldom, "j J a ud 10. Joiix Murray (Duke OF Atiiou, II &e. [S.]. also Karl Stkvnok [1786], Loud Sthanue [WW]; 1830 ""'^ l ' ,ABnN Mormaf of Stam.f.y [17863, ». and u. ; t>. 26 Barony. j ' ' June 1778 ; tuc. la the peerage [S., K. and O.B ) as abore ^ 2!) Sep. 1S30. See " ATBOIX,' Dukedom [S ] cr. 170:1 under ' ' J the f>lh aud subsequent Dukes, with which peerage the Earldom of Strange [17S6] aud the Iiarony of Slran'je [1628] have ever since continued united. her mother hy the first husband. She. who was h. 1710. was living 23 Feb. 1714/5 (see the will ..f that date of her grandmother, Elizabeth. Countess of Derby), but rf. unm. before 1718. (") The p'ace. in which he sat in 1754 was, however, that of a Barony nf tile creation of 1628, i.e., next below Maynard (cr. 1627) and next above Leigh (cr. 1643), notwithstanding that the precedency of 12^9 had been (wrongfully) allowed to his ancestor in 1628; See p. 260, note " b." () This title appears as if meant to commemorate the descent of the house of Murray from the family of Stanley. (<=) See vol. ii, p. 102, note "a." In this case (as in that of the Dukedom of Sutherland, en 1S33, and the Earldom of Ferrers, cr. 1711) the remainder (in hW male) of the peerage of higher rank, being different from that (in tail general) of WW peerage of the same name already enjoyed by the grantee, is very objectionable, inasmuch as they may at any time (aa has beeu the case with the two peerage* 0 * Ferrers) devolve on different parties.