This page has been validated.
xii
CONTENTS OF INTRODUCTION
| PAR. | PAGES | |
| 92. | (a) (b) and (d) identical in principle, the best attested reading of (a) and (b) corresponding to the one reading of (d); while in (c) decision rests on both Intrinsic and Transcriptional Evidence | 70 |
| B. 93—95. Removal of primitive errors by conjecture | 71, 72 | |
| 93. | Necessity of distinguishing recognition of primitive error from correction of it | 71 |
| 94. | Conjectural emendation founded on combination of Intrinsic and Transcriptional Evidence | 71 |
| 95. | The N. T. but slightly affected by the need of it | 72 |
| PART III | ||
| APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF CRITICISM TO THE TEXT OF THE NEW TESTAMENT | 73—287 | |
| 96. | Identity of methods for the N. T. and for other books, with difference of evidence | 73 |
| CHAPTER I. PRELIMINARY CHRONOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DOCUMENTS (97—128) | 73—90 | |
| 97. | Greek MSS, Versions, Fathers | 73 |
| A. 98—106. Greek MSS. | ||
| 98. | The four great uncial Bibles | 74 |
| 99. | Contents of other uncials | 75 |
| 100. | Chronological distribution of other uncials | 75 |
| 101. | Bilingual uncials | 75 |
| 102. | Cursives | 76 |
| 103. | Greek Lectionaries | 76 |
| 104. | Imperfect knowledge of cursives; | 76 |
| 105. | within what limits more complete knowledge could affect the text | 77 |
| 106. | Uncials almost completely known | 77 |
| B. 107—122. Versions | 78—86 | |
| 107. | The chief groups, Latin, Syriac, Egyptian | 78 |
| 108. | The Old Latin, (1) African, | 78 |
| 109. | The Old Latin, (2) European, | 78 |
| 110. | The Old Latin, (3) Italian | 79 |
| 111. | The Vulgate Latin | 80 |
| 112. | Corruption of the Latin Vulgate by mixture, and successive attempts to purify it | 81 |
| 113. | The extant Old Latin documents for the Gospels | 81 |
