Stone v. Farmers' Bank of Kentucky Farmers' Bank of Kentucky/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Stone v. Farmers' Bank of Kentucky Farmers' Bank of Kentucky/Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by Edward Douglass White
828347Stone v. Farmers' Bank of Kentucky Farmers' Bank of Kentucky/Opinion of the Court — Opinion of the CourtEdward Douglass White

United States Supreme Court

174 U.S. 409

Stone  v.  Farmers' Bank of Kentucky Farmers' Bank of Kentucky


The decree below, so far as it granted the relief prayed as against the defendants other than the city of Georgetown and the county of Scott, is affirmed by a divided court. The decree, so far as it adjudicated against the complainant and in favor of the defendants the city of Georgetown and the county of Scott, those defendants not having been parties of privies to the judgments pleaded as res judicata, must be affirmed upon the authority of the decision in Citizens' Sav. Bank of Owensboro v. City of Owensboro, 173 U.S. 636, 19 Sup. Ct. 530, 571. And it is so ordered.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse