# Translation:On the Theory of Relativity I: Four-dimensional Vector Algebra

Four-Dimensional Vector Algebra

by. A. SommerfeldIn this and some subsequent studies I want to illustrate, how remarkably simplified the electrodynamic concepts and calculations become, when we allow ourselves to be led by the deep space-time understanding of Minkowski. For the friend who suddenly passed away, the following would hardly provide any new insight; yet as elucidation of Minkowski's ideas it may be welcomed by some.

The content of the relativity principle can be formulated according to Minkowski: In the physical equations only *space-time vectors* are allowed to occur, *i.e.* quantities that have vector-character in the four-times manifold of space and time, the Minkowskian "world". Therefore when passing from one to a new reference system, its components can be transformed according to the scheme of the coordinate transformation for that manifold ("Lorentz transformation"). Instead of absolute space of the older theory, the absolute world takes its place, *i.e.* the connection of space and time by the speed of light , whose invariability now constitutes the absolute substrate of electrodynamics.

In this first part I confine myself to the algebraic relations of the space-time vectors. A second part "vector analysis" should illustrate the differential properties of the four-dimensional vector-fields. In particular I attached great importance to the geometric description (as far as possible) of the definition and the transformation of the vectors. The required concepts and calculations, that give also a full replacement for the matrix calculus used by Minkowski, are (when admitting imaginary coordinates) direct generalizations of the known three-dimensional vector-procedure.

## Contents

## § 1. Four- and Six-vectors.[edit]

It's well known that in space of three dimensions we have to distinguish between two kinds of vectors, *vectors of first kind* or polar vectors and *vectors of second kind* or axial vectors, also denoted as rotors or plan-quantities. A vector of first kind is a straight line provided with a direction-sense, its components are the perpendicular projections upon the coordinate-*axes*. A vector of second kind is a plane surface provided with a rotation sense, its components are the perpendicular projections of the surface upon the coordinate-*planes*. The components of the first ones are thus related to one axis for each component, those of the second ones are related to two axes for each component, thus the first has to be written with one and the latter with two indices. In mechanics, force and velocity belong to the first, torque and angular velocity to the second. *E. g.* the components of an angular velocity were to be written as ; only after passing to Grassmann's "supplement", *i.e.* the perpendicular upon the rotating plane, the ordinary notation is justified. Also the magnetic field strength belongs to the same class of vectors, as it was emphasized by Wiechert. The ordinary notation that is also maintained in the following, should consequently be replaced by .

In Minkowski^{[1]} space of four dimensions the vectors of first kind have four components, "four-vectors", those of second kind have six components, "six-vectors". There also exist vectors of third kind, that again become a four-component vector.^{[2]}

*four-vector* is *e.g.* a position vector from the origin to a space-time point (*x y z l*) with components

*l* as well as *x, y, z* is a length; the expression shall remind of a "way of light". The magnitude of that vector, *i.e.* the length of the corresponding four-dimensional distance, is:

Two vectors and shall be called *perpendicular to each other*, if

The coordinate vector (*x y z l*) is the type of all four-vectors. A quadruple of quantities only then deserves the name four-vector, when it is transformed by a coordinate change in the same manner as the coordinate vector, *i.e.* covariant with it. Here, the length of any four-vector is invariant; it is its unique invariant. Especially concerning the coordinate vector, the invariance of its length expresses the *principle of the constant propagation of light*. By the way, due to the imaginary character of its fourth components, the length of its four-vector can be zero, without that the vector and its components vanish.

A vector of first kind is also the "four-density *P*", that summarizes the concept of velocity and density of a moving charge, with the components:

(1) |

its length become

(1a) |

The vector-character of *P* is given as follows: We consider the worldline of a charge element *de*, *i.e.* the successive space-time locations of it in the *xyzl*-manifold. The worldline element between to adjacent points 1 and 2

*dx, dy, dz, dl*

is surely a four-vector covariant with the coordinate-vector. Afterwards we use the important principle *reference-frame independence of charge*, by which the electric mass is fundamentally distinguished before the material mass. This principle is of course in accordance with Maxwell's equations and is mentioned by Einstein as a consequence of it. By that:

*dS = dx dy dz* means the three-dimensional space-element, as well as is the same in a new "primed" reference system, that emerges from the original by a mere rotation around 0. In Fig. 1, and appear as two arbitrary bisections through the world-line-canal, that corresponds to the limits of *de*. If we put each of such bisection-pairs through the points 1 and 2, then one cuts out two equal four-dimensional space elements *dΣ*:

where are the heights of the two space elements *dΣ*, and at the same time the components of the worldline-element 12 into the axes , which as the fourth axes of our unprimed and primed reference system must stand perpendicularly upon and .^{[3]} By division of the two preceding equations it is given, that

is a reference-frame-independent scalar quantity. If we thus multiply the four-vector (*dx, dy, dz, dl*) by , then it keeps its vector-character; exactly the four-vector *P* from equation (1) occurs by that.

When passing to the space-time vectors of second kind, we consider in space of four dimensions a plane-section ^{[4]} numbers. But we have to consider, that to a plane in space of four dimensions, also the perpendicular plane (die ensemble of all those lines that are perpendicular to all lines of the first plane) are uniquely^{[5]} specified. In this normal plane we now imagine a second plane-section of specific magnitude. *The quintessence of two such plane-sections perpendicular to each other, is the geometric image of a vector of second kind.* It depends on six specification-sections, by adding to the five mentioned parts, the magnitude of the plane-section (that is perpendicular to it) as the sixth specification-section. We therefore speak about a *six-vector*. As its pure right-angled components in a *xyzl* coordinate space, we denote the sum of the perpendicular projections of the two plane-sections upon one of the six coordinate planes *xy, yz, .. zl*; the components of a six-vector shall therefore be written by two indices each, that must be mutually different, and their order is of importance.^{[6]}

To the *special space-time vector* of second kind, the simple plane-section, we can kinematically relate a *simple rotation*; to the *general six-vector*, the plane-pair, we relate a *general rotation* or a *helix*. Namely we have to note, that for the simplest rotation operation that let unchanged all points of a point in four dimensions, we have to speak not about a rotation axis, but about a rotation plane; that rotation plane it then given by the plane of our plane section, the rotation quantity is given by the magnitude of it. As in three dimensions, a helix^{[7]} is composed of a certain rotation and a translation to the axis of this translation, *i.e.* a rotation around the infinitely distant axis perpendicular to it, likewise the general rotation in four dimensions emerges from the composition of two simple rotations around two mutually perpendicular planes, in agreement with the constitution of our general six-vector from two perpendicular plane-sections. By this remark the expression "helix" for the general rotation may be justified.

A vector of second kind is *e.g.* the *six-vector *f* of the electromagnetic field* with the components

(2) |

The meaning of the six-vector and the relation of its components to two coordinate axis chosen in a certain order, corresponds to the general definition:

(2a) |

That the electric and magnetic forces and are combined by Minkowski to the higher unity of the six-vector *f*, is characterizing for the relativity theory, in which (depending on the reference system) the same field can appear as purely electric or as electromagnetic. *E.g* a uniform moving charge shows the co-moving observer only the "electric side" of the six-vector, but to the non-co-moving observer also its "magnetic side".

That the electromagnetic field is indeed to be understood as a six-vector, *i.e.* that when changing the reference frame its components are transformed accordingly to the type of the four-dimensional plane-section or plane-pair, follows from the fact, that due to Maxwell's equations the field is connected with the four-density *P* by the divergence condition (see later).

To better become acquainted with the six-vector, we consider the special case of a single plane-section of area 1 and give it the form of a parallelogram that emerges from the origin. The two sides of it may be the four-vectors *u, v*. Then the projection of that plane-section upon the *xy*-plane is specified by the projections of the four-vectors, namely

(3) |

Between the thus formed six components of this specific six-vector, of which only five are independent from each other by the counting on p. 753, the identity exists:

(3a) |

as it can directly be proven by multiplication of the relevant determinants. Furthermore^{[8]} the area of the surface section must be defined as the square root of the square sum of its six components. In our case we thus have:

(3b) |

(perpendicular to ) of area 1, that we can also denote as the "supplement" of that, and claim that its components are

On the other hand we consider the surface-section(3c) |

or in general, when we indicate the indices that are nor illustrated by brackets

(3d) |

where in respect to the order of the indices *ik(ik)* it must be defined, that it must emerge from the order *x y z l* by an *even* number of permutations.

For verification we represent again by two four-vectors *u*v**, which individually are perpendicular to *uv*. That means (see the above definition of perpendicularity) the existence of the following equations:

By multiplying them by respectively, and subtracting the second from the first and the fourth from the third, we obtain:

Furthermore, if we multiply these two equations by or respectively, and subtract them from each other, then it follows

Due to we can write the proportion:

Accordingly it is given:

and thus, when *λ* means the factor of proportionality:

as well as should have the same area 1, then in accordance with the claim before (3d).

However, asThe identity (3a) can be written, by using the expression of § 3A, also in this way:

(3a) |

The general six-vector *f* now emerges from the two special ones and in the form

(4) |

and are the areas of the two mutually perpendicular surface-sections of orientation and , of which *f* is composed. To *f* we form the "dual vector *f**", its "supplement" by permutation of the surfaces and . Namely, *f** may be defined in consequence of (4):

From that it follows *e.g.* for the *yz*-components of this dual vector

(4b) |

in the same way

(4b) |

and in general

(4c) |

so that *f* and *f** are, with respect to each other, in the same relation, as the special surface-section with perpendicular to it.

Also the quantities and (*ff**) can be expressed by and in accordance with (3b, e).

(5a) |

(5b) |

Both have to be denoted as *invariants* of the six-vector, as they have, like the surfaces and , a geometric meaning independent of the location of the coordinate system. We can, for example, denote as (geometric) surface sum, and (*ff**) as (double) surface product. In case *f* means the electromagnetic force, we have by (2) and (5a, b)

(5c) |

The expression *L* means "Lagrangian function of unit volume".

However, besides the components related to the coordinate *planes*, we can also speak of its components related to the coordinate *spaces* and coordinate *axes*.

By the component related to coordinate space, we understand a surface section that lies in this space, which we obtain when we project the two surface sections and upon this space, and form the geometric sum of their two projections. *E.g.* the component of *f* in relation to the space of *x y z*, is the three-dimensional vector of second kind:

By the component related to a coordinate axis^{[9]}, we understand a surface-section obtained by splitting off (from the surface sections and ) its components in relation to the space perpendicular with this axis, and the two remaining surface-sections are combined geometrically. If we intersect the resulting surface with the space perpendicular to the axis, then a three-dimensional vector of first kind in this space arises. *E.g.* the component of *f* in relation to the axis of *l*, is the three-dimensional vector of first kind:

(6) |

that also can be interpreted as the special four-vector of the vanishing *l*-component. In general shall be the four-vector that is perpendicular to the *j*-axis:

(6a) |

The component of the supplement *f** related to the *j*-axis has the corresponding meaning:

(6b) |

and in particular

(6c) |

Besides vectors of first and second kind, also vectors of third kind exist in four-dimensional space, which are again four-vectors given not by a distance, but by a three-dimensional space-section, and which were written with three indices as projections of the space-section upon the four coordinate spaces, *e.g.*

Geometrically, to such a vector of third kind we can attribute a vector of first kind, its "supplement", namely the line perpendicular to the space section whose length is equal to the size of the space-section. The components of the latter

are one after the other equal to the components of the vector of third kind. The replaceability of the vector of third kind by its supplement is reaching even further, like the relation of the supplement with the vector of second kind in the case of three dimensions, in so far as in this case the supplement (due to the even dimension number) correctly reproduces the behavior of the vector of third kind, not only regarding coordinate transformations of determinant +1, but also regarding such of determinant -1 (mirroring, inversion). As the summarizing denotation for the vector of first and third kind, the name "four-vector" is recommended.

Since we can geometrically compose any two space sections by vectorial addition of their supplements, we don't obtain a more general vector of third kind through a space-pair as through a single space-section. Indeed the latter has already four mutually independent specification-sections - its size and the three data that are necessary for the definition of its location.

An important example (compare § 3B and §4) for a vector of third kind, we will find in the electrodynamic force (*Pf*).

## § 2. Component formation into arbitrary directions and planes, and its connection with the Lorentz transformation.[edit]

It's characteristic for the vector-concept and its independence of the coordinate system, that we can speak of its components into arbitrary directions (planes as regards the six-vector). By the component of a four-vector into the -axis we have to think of the perpendicular projection upon this axis, *i.e.*

(7) |

If is a "space-like" axis, then^{[10]} , , become real, becomes purely imaginary, so that (see (1) and 7)) becomes real. On the other hand, is purely imaginary when is a "time-like" axis.

By the component of a six-vector into an arbitrary plane, which we think as given by two mutually perpendicular directions contained in it, we understand the sum of the perpendicular projections of the surface sections (that forms the vector *f*) upon this plane; it can be calculated from the two-row determinant of the direction cosine:

(8) |

For verification we consider at first the special six-vector (pure surface section of magnitude 1) and illustrate those as in §1 in the form of a parallelogram by two four-vectors *u,v*. Then the surface-section (projected upon the x'y'-plane, *i.e.* the sought component , is specified by the projections of the four-vectors upon the - and -axis as in equation (3) by:

If we substitute into its value from (7) and write, according to (3), and for the sub-determinants, then exactly the equation (8) for the special case is given. The same equations also arise for the surface-section (perpendicular to ) and therefore also for the sum , that means the general six-vector by equation (4). The component rule (8) for the six-vector is also a necessary consequence of that for the four-vector (7).

Regarding the reality-relations, it is similar for the components of the four-vector: consists of only real, of only imaginary terms, when the axes are space-like, and is time-like.

Furthermore we consider the quadruple of four-vectors derived from the six-vector *f*, and ask for the expression of the components of *f* into the new -axis (which thus means a surface-section parallel to x', or a four-vector perpendicular to this axis) from the components into the original axes. Indeed, by stating , also must be given. We claim, that the following connection exists:

(9) |

Equation (9) is formally in agreement with (7), but also essentially differs from it, because on the right-hand side of (9) there are four directed four-vectors, on the side of (7) there are four undirected components. Equation (9) is of course to be proved due to the vector-property of *f*, equation (8). We denote the vector-sum that occurs in (9) by :

*x y z l* by equation (6a):

If we multiply one after the other by , , , (by we understand an arbitrary axis at first), and sum up, then by (7) the components of into this axis emerge, and namely it is given:

- for the sum 0,
- for the expression (8),
- for the same expression by permutation of with a new direction (perpendicular to ) etc.

The right-hand side of (9) indeed represents the quadruple of that magnitude, denoted by us as by equation (6), namely the quadruple

For the sake of completeness, also the behavior of a vector of third kind in its projection upon an arbitrary space may be mentioned. Its component into space would be calculated by a four-parametric expression, in which the three-row sub-determinants of the direction cosine occur as coefficients, yet for which we can put (by the conditions of orthogonality that exist between them) the direction cosine of the common perpendicular . The four-vector of third kind is also projected the same way as the four-vector of first kind forming its supplement.

Now, we prove to ourselves, that the projection- and component-formulas developed here, are identical with the transformation formulas of relativity theory. For this sake we consider, as usual, the special case, that the new reference system of corresponds in the two middle axes with the original one of *x y z l*, so that one from the other can obtained by a rotation in the *xl*-plane (around the *yz*-plane) (rotation angle ); namely the -axis may be space-like, thus the -axis is time-like. Then

(10) |

If we apply the component formula (7) to the coordinate vector (*x y z l*), then we obtain

(10a) |

Now , since by the remark on p. 760 and , thus , and are purely imaginary, and . Thus we have, when denotes a real fraction:

(10b) |

Consequently the equations (10a) become identical with the Lorentz-Einstein transformation and show, that means the velocity, by which (in space of *xyz*) the new system of axis is uniformly displaced in the *x*-direction against the original one.

At the same time equation (8) shows, as to how the six-vector of the field is transformed (or "projected"). We have by (8) and (10):

or because of (10b) and (2):

(10c) |

By that also these well-known transformation formulas of the field appear to be the immediate consequence of Maxwell's equation, from which these formulas were derived by Lorentz and Einstein, we didn't speak at all (except in so far, as we have denoted *f* as six-vector by referring to those equations). Generally, according to Einstein and Minkowski the relativity principle is to be seen as a superior principle above electrodynamics.

## § 3. Product of four- and six-vectors.[edit]

### A. *Scalar products*.[edit]

Two four-vectors *P* and will be *scalar*-multiplied by the rule

*E.g.*, if *P* means the four-density, the four-potential (combination of scalar and vector potential, see later), then becomes the "electro-kinetic potential" of Schwarzschild. The square of the length of a four-vector is equal to the scalar product by itself, *e.g.* see (1a).

In case of arbitrary motion of *P* and , the formula taken from ordinary vector calculus

defines the direction cosine of two arbitrary directions; it was used in this sense already at the beginning of § 2, footnote. The definition of perpendicularity from the beginning of § 1 is a special case of this.

Also two *six-vectors* *f* and *F* can be *scalar*-multiplied by the rule

Into this rule belong the two invariants of the six-vector *f*, see (5a, b)

### B. Vector products.[edit]

Two *four-vectors u, v,* will be *vector*-multiplied by a rule, which is analogous to the ordinary three-dimensional vector product. Like in that place a vector of second case emerges from two vectors of second kind, here a *six-vector* results from two four-vectors, namely a special six-vector (simple surface section) with the invariant . The multiplication rule already used in § 1 reads

means the *parallelogram* formed by *u* and *v* in terms of size and location.

We can also *vector*-unify a *four-vector* and a *six-vector*, namely to a *four-vector of third kind*. If the six-vector is in particular a simple surface section, then the vector of third kinds means the *parallelepiped* directly formed by the four-vector and the supplement of that surface-section. In the general case it will be constructed as the geometric sum of two such *parallelepipeds*, yet it can always be replaced (see the end of §1) by a four-vector of first kind. This state of facts is the same as in ordinary vector calculus, where a vector of first kind emerges by vector-multiplication of a vector of first and second kind. The formal scheme of that multiplication is taken by us from this three-dimensional case.

be the vector of first kind and the vector of second kind. From the latter we form three special vectors of first kind, namely

in general , from which all are perpendicular to the *j*-axis because of . Like in §1 equation (6a), they can also be called the components of the surface section into the *j*-axis, and originally they denote the surface sections parallel to this axis. As *j*-component of the vector product of and , we now have to define the scalar product of the two vectors of first kind and , namely

*e.g.* for :

By that we define in the four-dimensional case the product (*PF*) from an arbitrary four-vector *P* and a six-vector *f* by its four components for *j = x, y, z, l*, by means of formula:

(11) |

Any of this components it thus given by scalar-multiplication of the four-vector *P* with the four-vector (perpendicular to the *j*-axis, defined in (6a), and derived from *f*). In the next paragraph we consider the electrodynamic force as an important example of this. In this place, at first the already mentioned geometric meaning of this vector of third kind may be derived, in the special case, where represents a simple surface-section.

We replace as a parallelogram by two four-vectors *u, v* and go over to the dual surface section consisting of two four-vectors *u*, v** parallel to *u, v*. Then the components of prove to be equal to the four three-row sub-determinants of the scheme

(11a) |

When neglecting the first colon it is namely given:

For that we can write by (5a):

which is in agreement with our definition (11) of .

means by the known formulas of space geometry, a parallelepiped situated in the *yzl*-space formed by the vectors , , , *i.e.* by the projections of the four-vectors *P, u*, v** upon the *yzl*-space; is at the same time also the projection of the parallelepiped (formed by these four-vectors, situated in four-dimensional space) upon the coordinate space of *yzl*. By the definition of the end of §1, indeed represent the components of a vector of third kind. By denoting this components with instead of the more extensive , we already executed the passage from the space section to its supplement (the line perpendicular to the space section). That the quantity considered as a vector of first kind, is perpendicular to the parallelepiped (formed by the vectors *P, u*, v**), can directly be seen. We only have to supplement the above 3 × 4-row determinant scheme by addition of the four components of *P* or *u** or *v** to a vanishing four-row determinant, and obtain:

If we are dealing with the product of *P* with a general six-vector , then we shall consider in the same way the two parallelepipeds *D* and *D**, which are formed by the vectors *P, u*, v** and *P, u, v*, respectively. Then represents the geometric sum of these two space sections, which we can imagine as to be constructed by the supplements (perpendicular to that space section), as the resultant of the two lines and .

### C. Tensor products.[edit]

A *vector of second kind* gives, completely multiplied by itself, a *tensor*. We explain the way of constitution at first in the three-dimensional case.

If is a three-dimensional vector of second kind with components , and are whatever two of the three special vectors derived from it (see p. 765), then it is in general for *j, h = x, y, z*

From that it directly follows

The thus defined three-dimensional tensor quantity has six components, and differs essentially from our four-dimensional six-vector, for which is given. The six components of *T* can be most conveniently, geometrically interpreted as coefficients of the equation of a surface of second degree.

In the four-dimensional case we accordingly start with a six-vector *f*, and define a tensor (*ff*) by all possible scalar products of the special four-vectors (derived by equation (6a) from *f*) for *h, j = x, y, z, l*. From that, at first 16 tensor components follow

which, however, are reduced to 10 because of . The calculation gives, if especially means the field vector, for *j = h*:

and for

Besides we also consider the tensor (*f*f**) which is formed by the dual six-vector , whose components emerge form the preceding by permutation of by and by , *e.g.*

and eventually go over to the tensor^{[11]} (composed by both):

(12) |

with the components

(12a) |

(12b) |

(12c) |

As it can be seen, the components are identical with the above components ; the components that are different from , satisfy the relation . The three components (12c) are, after multiplication by -*ic*, equal to the components of Poynting's energy flux, the first three components (12a) and the three components (12b) represent Maxwell's stresses, while the fourth component (12a) is the negatively taken energy density.

Also now, it is most convenient to interpret the 16 tensor components as coefficients in the equation of a three-dimensional "space of second degree" located in four-dimensional space.

The product formations discussed here, do all correspond to Minkowski's matrix scheme. Without doubt this offers (in mathematical view) the advantage of greatest generality and simplicity. On the contrary, in the preceding it was tried to emphasize the special geometric meaning of the single products by ordinary vector calculus.

All these products are, by their geometric meaning, independent of the choice of reference frame, namely in the following way: The scalar products (considered in A) are pure invariants of the Lorentz transformation. The vector products (considered in B) were transformed covariantly

as a six- or a four-vector; their components in the new reference frame are thus only connected to those of the old reference frame by the formulas of §2.For the vector product (*Pf*) we can calculate this directly from equation (9). Namely, if we scalar-multiply the four-vectors located at the left and right sides with the four-vector *P*, then

*i.e.* that formula which, by §2 equation (7), expresses the -component of a four-vector by the old components. (*Pf*) is thus a true four-vector and its projection upon the -direction.

At the same time also the new tensor components are calculated from the old tensor components by the simple scheme of the tensor transformation, whose coefficients are quadratically formed from the direction cosine of the new against the old coordinate axes.

## § 4. The electrodynamic force .[edit]

The covariant formation (*Pf*) from the four-density* P* and the field-vector *f* (discussed in the previous paragraph under (11)) requires a special interest. Its formal calculation gives:

and similarly for the *y,z*-components; in contrast for the *l*-component:

In the expression of the ordinary three-dimensional vector calculation we thus find for j* = x, y, z* or *l*:

(13) |

thus represents the *j*-component of the electrodynamic force (acting on the unit volume), and the electrical work (multiplied with *i/c*) on the moving charge per unit volume and time. The latter shall be denoted *energetic*, the first *dynamic* components.

If we decompose into two simple surface sections, then , as discussed in the previous paragraph, is decomposed into two simple space sections, whose suplements are perpendicular to the four-density *P*. Since the latter (see the beginning of §1) has the direction of the worldline element of the charge (its components were proportional to *dx, dy, dz, dl*), *then also the force is perpendicular to the worldline of its point of contact*. The corresponding requirement is to be extended to an arbitrary force, as long as we exclude dissipative processes like the generation of Joulean heat etc.

The fourth energetic component of has in no way only a formal meaning, as it might appear at first. Rather (when changing frames) it is located directly at the real dynamic components. If it is (*e.g.* like in equation (10a)) a reference frame emerging from the original one by a rotation in the *xl*-plane, then

(14) |

The energetic supplementary terms (or are small and of order , since (or as well as contain the factor . *Nevertheless this supplementary terms are indispensable for carrying out the principle of relativity*, as it will be shown later by the example of the simple Coulomb law.

If the dynamic components and for any force in two relatively moving systems are known, *e.g.* by sufficiently exact measurements, then we can (by comparison according to the preceding formulas) specify the energetic components and . Conversely, we can also say: *A force* (*e.g.* also gravitation) *is only then physically known*, *i.e.* in the sense of the relativity principle specifiable for an arbitrary reference frame, *when also its energetic component is known*.

is at rest in this reference frame, then and also , since the force on the worldline of its point of contact is perpendicular. Only in this case the energetic component vanishes out of the formulas for the determination of , thus having the simple form (*x*-direction = direction of relative motion):

(14a) |

These are the typical transformation formulas for the passage from the "co-moving" to the "resting system", valid for any vector of first (or third) kind, especially for the electrodynamic force related to unit volume. We assume, that any "specific" force, *i.e.* calculated per unit volume, also behaves as a vector of first kind.

It is different for the entire force or in the stationary or co-moving system, of which the first, due to its relation to an arbitrary coordinate system, has actually no place in relativity theory. By the specific force is can be thus defined:

(15) |

if *dS = dy dy dz* is the three-dimensional volume element in the stationary, is that in the co-moving system. The latter differs from the first, depending on the mutual location of both reference frames. By addition of *dS*, , the vector character of the right-hand side will thus be disturbed. The entire force doesn't simply behave as a vector of first kind.

From Fig. 1 it follows

(15a) |

If, what we don't presuppose, the primed system with its -axis is orientated into the world-line of the contact point of , then the -space and its volume element is perpendicular to this worldline, and is the perpendicular projection of *dS* in this space. The projection angle is equal to the angle of the two considered perpendiculars and *l*, thus equal to . The circumstance, that is imaginary, has the consequence that the projection is greater than the projected element *dS*, opposing to our image in Fig. 1, that operates with a real . The ratio is the known Lorentz contraction.

From (15), (15a) and (14a) it directly follows:

and summarizing:

(14b) |

These formulas (14b), when compared with (14a), prove the preceding explanation, that doesn't behave like a vector. Namely, if we denote, in formal analogy to our vector notation, by and the square sum of the unprimed and primed components (where is zero according to definition equation (15)), then because of (14b), is not becoming equal to , but

while from (14a), as it must be the case for a four-vector, it follows of course .

We also especially consider the case of a normal pressure acting in the primed system, that acts upon a surface at rest in the primed system, which gives rise to pressure that coincides with the perpendicular and which is measured per unit area. We can interpret this case, either as a distribution of infinitely small total-forces or infinitely great specific forces , according to one or the other of the following two schemes

The first standpoint was taken by Einstein^{[12]}. The latter should be preferable because of the vivid vectorial behavior of . From this standpoint we think of as being distributed over a layer of thickness which is adjacent to surface , similarly as we interpret the surface charge as the limit of a spatial distribution.

If we erect upon this three-dimensional layer (located in -space) a four-dimensional cylinder parallel to the -axis, then this encloses the entirety of all worldlines of the layer points. The force , that should be perpendicular to in -space, also coincides with the perpendicular of that four-dimensional cylinder, since it is also perpendicular to the worldline at its contact point. If we lay any inclined intersection as *xyz*-space through the cylinder, then it intersects (from the cylinder) the image of the layer that appears to an observer in the *xyzl*-system. In Fig. 2, the (by p. 753, Note 2 completely specified) normal plane (laid through the considered point of ) to the tangential plane of , is chosen as drawing plane. This not only contains the normal *n* of in *xyz*-space, but also the cylinder-normal as well as the *l*-axis, since all three directions are perpendicular to . In the -direction falls the direction of vector ; by direction and size we have . For the reference frame *xyzl* it is decomposed in two components, which both can be seen in the figure: the energetic component and the dynamic .

On the other hand, the component of perpendicular to the drawing plane in the tangential plane of doesn't exist, i.e. *also in the unprimed system* (after separation of its energetic component) *the force and its corresponding pressure p normal to its contact-area *. Regarding the magnitude of *p*, it directly follows from the figure: If is the angle between *n* and (where will lie between 0 and and will assume these most extreme values, when lies especially perpendicular or parallel to the direction of relative motion of the primed and unprimed system). Then it is obviously given

thus

Because the unprimed observer defines its pressure *p* by the dynamic component of , and the layer-thickness *dn* (seen by him) by in the same way as the primed by . *The equality of these two pressures*, fundamental for Planck's thermodynamics of moving systems, *thus follows here again as purely geometric statement concerning the behavior of four-dimensional vectors and its projection*.

When operating with the total-force , such a direct geometric reasoning can hardly be carried out, because doesn't behave like a vector.

We again come back to the electrodynamic meaning of . While this was, at the beginning of this paragraph, explained by the formal agreement with Lorentz's force-definition, equation (13), it should be directly derived from the relativity principle now.

We consider a unit volume at rest in the primed system, in which the electric charge is distributed by the density . Since the electric field-strength is defined as the moving force upon the charge 1, then the force is acting on our unit volume. By this the three dynamic components of the specific force are specified; the energetic component is to be put equal to zero, since the contact-point of is at rest in the primed system, and its worldline is perpendicular to . The four components of thus read:

On the other hand, the vector (*Pf*) for the -axis gives by equation (11), since , (see equation (1)) and etc. (see equation (2));

. *Under the single assumption, that the force behaves like a four-vector, must be given for any reference system by the four-vector (Pf).* In relativity theory, Lorentz's force-definition directly follows from the definition of the electric field-strength by the single assumption, that the specific force behaves as a four-vector perpendicular to the worldline of the contact-point. In the original absolute-theory of Lorentz, in contrast, this force-definition had to be introduced as a new fact of experience besides the field-equations. *It seems to me a particularly nice achievement of relativity theory, that it makes this fact of experience unnecessary as such, by deriving it from much more general principles.*

Following this, a remark of a more critical nature is appended. The relativity principle should be valid only for stationary or quasi-stationary motions of both reference systems against each other. A derivation of Lorentz's force-concept from relativity theory, consequently guarantees it only for the realm of these motions. While in relativity theory this concept was postulated as generally valid, we have (when we consider the relativity principle as its true source) to let it open at all, whether in the expression of for a real accelerated motion there might occur supplementary terms that might depend on the acceleration of first and higher order. As it seems, all realizable motions fall under the class of quasi-stationary motions, thus such supplementary terms would hardly have a practical interest. Yet in a principle view it seems useful to me, to consider its possibility.

- ↑ The two papers of Minkowski are:
*The Fundamental Equations for Electromagnetic Processes in Moving Bodies*, Göttinger Nachr. 1908. p. 1 or Mathematische Ann.**68**, p. 472. 1910, also separately to be published soon by B.G. Teubner;*Space and Time*, Physik. Zeitschr. 10. p. 104. 1909, also separately by B.G. Teubner, with a portrait of Minkowski. - ↑ Corresponding to the number of coordinate axes, -planes and -spaces calculated by the number of combinations of four elements to each 1, 2 or 3, namely:
- ↑ I think it is allowed to arrange the image and the expression, as if
*l*is real and the perpendicularity is euclidean. Of course, in reality an imaginary*l*and a non-euclidean perpendicularity is meant, which according to Minkowski can be constructed by a hyperbola or a hyperboloid. It is possible, but not recommended, to reinterpret all that follows accordingly in a non-euclidean way. - ↑ We can imagine that the location of the plane-section is given by two four-vectors that emerge from two arbitrary points of the plane, and which are arbitrarily located within the plane. Their location is at first specified by three magnitudes,
*e.g.*the relation of its four components. However, any of the two four-vectors can arbitrarily rotated within the plane. By that we can give to each of their three specification-sections an arbitrary value. Thus 2(3-1) = 4 specification-sections for the location of the plane remain only. - ↑ We think of two lines drawn in the first plane, and we construct the entirety of the lines that are perpendicular to them, where each line fills a linear space. These two spaces intersect each other in a plane containing all common perpendiculars of both starting lines, and which is thus the normal plane of the first plane. The two planes perpendicular to each other, as well as any two planes of general location, have only one point in common. Because any plane in a space of four dimensions is given by two linear equations, and four linear equations uniquely specify a point.
- ↑ Permutation of
*xy*by*yx*means a projection upon the back of the*xy*-plane and therefore, as with three dimensions, a sign reversal. - ↑ To this analogy also Minkowski refers: Space and Time § V.
- ↑ Its square is at first given by the formula of ordinary planimetry:
compare § 3A, from which equation (3b) directly follows by a suitable combination of the components.

- ↑ This at first somehow complicated term appears indispensable to me for the geometrical interpretation of the subsequent differential vector-operations.
- ↑ If are the coordinates of an arbitrary point upon the axis of in the system of
*x y z l*and if we put , then by the general definition of § 3 A:The axis is space-like if , that is , and time-like if . In the first case the first three cosines are real and the last is imaginary, in the second case the first three are imaginary and the last is real.

- ↑ According to a friendly suggestion of my colleague M. Laue.
- ↑ A. Einstein, Jahrbuch f. Radioakt. 4. 448.

Original: | This work is in the The author died in 1951, so this work is also in the |
---|---|

Translation: |