From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Stuff I'm doing (or did, or plan to do... in no particular order)[edit]

   Index:Anna Karenina.djvu
   Index:Yorkshire Oddities, Incidents and Strange Events.djvu
   Index:Post - Uncle Abner (Appleton, 1918).djvu
   Index:The works of the late Edgar Allan Poe volumes 1-2.djvu - Vol. 1
   Index:A History of the Knights of Malta, or the Order of St. John of Jerusalem.djvu
   Index:A History of Art in Ancient Egypt Vol 1.djvu - my first adventure in WS land... will probably never see it finished :)
   Index:Witch-Cult in Western Europe (1921).djvu
   Index:Sacred Books of the Buddhists Vol 1.djvu

Notable edits[edit]

(A list in progress...)

It's all about teh wikiality [citation needed][edit]

This is a bit overdone but is true enough to be said: “The Wikipedia philosophy can be summed up thusly: "Experts are scum." For some reason people who spend 40 years learning everything they can about, say, the Peloponnesian War -- and indeed, advancing the body of human knowledge -- get all pissy when their contributions are edited away by Randy in Boise who heard somewhere that sword-wielding skeletons were involved. And they get downright irate when asked politely to engage in discourse with Randy until the sword-skeleton theory can be incorporated into the article without passing judgment. Lore Sjöberg, "The Wikipedia FAQK"

My comment: A common rebuttal to the above is that WP:V exists, i.e., editors (expert or otherwise) must support their edits with good sources, so that makes everything wonderful. What is missed by that rebuttal is that Randy in Boise, in his cluelessness about the Peloponnesian War (combined with his conviction that he actually does understand it), won't understand how to evaluate whether sources are any good, let alone how to weight them.

"Consensus" does not magically generate accuracy. With persistence, it is possible to introduce considerable bias or flat-out misinformation, especially if multiple so-inclined editors are involved. Bias in, bias out.

Hat tip: Middle_8 as of 2016/10/10

Notes to self: … -- Table:

Nice (and necessary) project:’s_Guide

Awards for participation
Babel user information
es-N Este usuario tiene una comprensión nativa del español.
en-3 This user has advanced knowledge of English.
de-3 Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf hohem Niveau.
pt-1 Este utilizador tem um nível básico de português.
Users by language