Wikisource talk:Text quality

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Problem entering an URL in the infobox source line[edit]

I've tried to note the source of a text I added (see Talk:Speech against the Union but it wouldn't accept it. Whenever the URL was included in the source line it just ignored any & all text on that line & moved the contributors text up to the source line. Anyone know the reason for this? AllanHainey 12:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Textquality template[edit]

Where does the textquality template fit into this? Is it being phased out? Recommended for use? I only stumbled across it when I noticed the icon at the top of an article and wondered how that was done. If it's recommended, we should probably have a link to it somewhere. -- Quoth 16:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

It's been linked through the Style Guide. Banjee ca 01:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Icons in corner[edit]

How about we had these little text quality icons appear on the top left corner of the article, much like the way that in en.wikipedia for each Featured Article a little star icon appears at the same place? Would that be too hard to implement? --Wikipedia:User:Michalis Famelis

This is already done using {{textquality}}. For example, see Alone (see the article tab). // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 16:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

recommendation is to change the ranking[edit]

Currently there is a discussion at Wikisource:Scriptorium#Text quality notation about changing the ranking used for rating articles level of development. Jeepday (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Category links?[edit]

Maybe this page should link to the categories 100%, 75%, etc? Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Seems useful[edit]

For keeping track of status, progress, and knowing where to go to verify people's proofing. Put me down for a vote in favor of bringing it back if that ever comes up. — LlywelynII 04:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)