User talk:SpikeShroom

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikisource

Hello, SpikeShroom, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

You may be interested in participating in

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! Beeswaxcandle (talk) 04:49, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits to EB1911[edit]

Hi SpikeShroom, I wanted to express my thanks for your edits on Page:EB1911 - Volume 01.djvu/666. I made a few more edits, including finding the missing illegible character (mu). It is visible in the high-res scans at archive.org, specifically archive.org/details/encyclopaediabri01chisrich/page/626. I use these scans from time to time to check words (and Greek & Hebrew diacritics) and for images. DivermanAU (talk) 03:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I always like an excuse to use my TeX skills. I'll try my hand at the other pages, and I'll keep your advice in mind if I come across some ambiguous characters. SpikeShroom (talk) 03:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Series[edit]

Some volumes are part of a series, for which conventions of style have been applied uniformly across that series. Making random changes to style that break formatting of text, introduce unnecessary minor changes, interfere with transclusion of content, and use undesirable templates should not be undertaken without consultation, especially in Validated pages. --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Though I apologize for diverging from the conventions of the series and accept the reversal of my edits, my changes are not random. I edit what I feel could use improvement and do so to the best of my ability thus far. Thank you for notifying me of my mistake, but I don't appreciate your condescension. SpikeShroom (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
When you begin massively altering the formatting of others, and call it "polishing" in the edit summary, that's condescending. --EncycloPetey (talk) 17:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone through my Preferences and enabled notifications for reversals of my edits. Hopefully this will allow me to understand my errors in any future disputes before the editor-in-opposition resorts to posting impolite messages on my Discussion page. SpikeShroom (talk) 22:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]