Anglo-Saxon Riddles of the Exeter Book
 | A scan-backed, verifiable version of this work can be edited at Index:Anglo-Saxon Riddles of the Exeter Book (1963).djvu. If you would like to help, please see Help:Match and split and Help:Proofread. |
ANGLO-SAXON RIDDLES OF THE EXETER BOOK
Anglo-Saxon Riddles
of the Exeter Book
translated by
PAULL F. BAUM
DUKE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Durham, North Carolina
1963
© 1963, Duke University Press
Library of Congress Catalogue Card number 63-21168
Cambridge University Press, London, N. W. 1, England
Printed in the United States of America
by the Seeman Printery, Inc., Durham, N. C.
PREFACE
THE ninety-odd riddles in Anglo-Saxon which have come down to us in a single manuscript are naturally a miscellaneous collection of varying merit. A few of them are poetical in the best sense of Anglo-Saxon poetic style, as good as anything outside the heroic style of the Beowulf. Many of them are interesting as riddles: intentional ambiguities to be solved by reader or hearer. Some of them are learned, turning on the interpretation of runic letters or dealing with subjects only the monkish mind would care about. Some of them are neat and clever and well versified; others are not so good.
In the manuscript the riddles appear in no particular order. The following translations have been grouped according to subject. It was not feasible to arrange them by types, because the typical forms of the riddle are not clearly fixed and the Anglo-Saxon riddles are too few to illustrate many types.
The language of the Anglo-Saxon riddles is often difficult, and even those who are fairly familiar with Old English cannot read them readily. Though some of the best have been translated in scattered places, and there is a prose line-for-line translation in the E.E.T.S. edition of the Exeter Book, not readily accessible to the common reader, it has seemed worthwhile to render them all in similar verse form, with brief explanations, for any who may be interested in the riddles as such and for the glimpses they afford of monkish diversion and of daily life in England of the eighth and ninth centuries—in modern terms, for their psychological and sociological values.
I am deeply indebted to Professor Elliott V. K. Dobbie for reading my manuscript with great care and suggesting many improvements.
P.F.B.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ix
I. NATURAL PHENOMENA 3
II. CHIEFLY CHRISTIAN 12
III. BIRDS 21
IV. OTHER ANIMALS 24
V. DOMESTIC SUBJECTS 28
VI. WRITING 33
VII. MUSIC 36
VIII. WEAPONS, FIGHTING 38
IX. HORN 43
X. MISCELLANEOUS 47
XI. RUNES 53
XII. THE ‘OBSCENE’ RIDDLES 57
XIII. FRAGMENTS 61
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE 67
NUMBERING OF THE TRANSLATIONS AND
THE KRAPP–DOBBIE EDITION 67
INDEX OF SOLUTIONS 69
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
| Original: | 
This work was published before January 1, 1928, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago. |
|---|---|
| Translation: |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
Works published in 1963 would have had to renew their copyright in either 1990 or 1991, i.e. at least 27 years after they were first published/registered but not later than 31 December in the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on 1 January 1992. The longest-living author of this work died in 1964, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 58 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.  It is imperative that contributors search the renewal databases and ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation. 
|