CONTENTS.
xvii
| 5. | All men are equally cognisant of the absolute, | 378 |
| 6. | A reminder, | 379 |
| 7. | Confusion might have been obviated had it been shown that all men are equally cognisant of the absolute, | 379 |
| 8. | The difficulty is, not to know it, but to know that we know it, | 380 |
| 9. | Refutation of the relationist doctrine, | 380 |
| 10. | Kant on the Absolute, | 381 |
| 11. | The relation of non-contradictories and the relation of contradictories, | 383 |
| PROPOSITION XXII. | ||
| The Contingent Conditons of Knowledge, | 384 | |
| Demonstration, | 384 | |
| Observations and Explanations, | 385 | |
| 1. | This proposition takes us out of necessary into contingent truth, | 385 |
| 2. | It is introduced in order that the necessary may be separated from the contingent laws, | 386 |
| 3. | Why this analysis is indispensable, | 387 |
| 4. | What is required in setting about this analysis, | 388 |
| 5. | The analysis illustrated, | 388 |
| 6. | The analysis illustrated, | 390 |
| 7. | It is unnecessary to carry the analysis into greater detail, | 391 |
| 8. | How these remarks qualify the doctrine of the absolute given in Proposition XXI., | 392 |
| 9. | The absolute, however, is still object + subject. The main result of the epistemology, | 393 |
| 10. | Twenty-second Counter-proposition, | 393 |
| 11. | The chief point to be attended to in it, | 394 |
| 12. | The cause of the errors of representation ism pointed out., | 394 |
| 13. | The same subject continued, | 396 |
| 14. | The cause of Berkeley's errors pointed out, | 397 |
| 15. | The main result of the epistemology, | 399 |
| 16. | The importance of this result, | 401 |
| SECTION II. | ||
| THE AGNOIOLOGY, OR THEORY OF IGNORANCE. | ||
| PROPOSITION I. | ||
| What Ignorance is, | 405 | |
| Demonstration, | 405 | |
| Observations and Explanations, | 405 | |
| 1. | Why this proposition is introduced, | 405 |
| 2. | Novelty of the agnoiology, | 406 |
| 3. | The agnoiology is indispensable, | 406 |
| 4. | The plea of our ignorance a bar to ontology, | 407 |
| 5. | This obstacle can be removed only by an inquiry into the nature of ignorance, | 408 |
| 6. | First Counter-proposition, | 408
|
