Page:US Senate Report on CIA Detention Interrogation Program.pdf/96

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

UNCLASSIFIED
TOP SECRET// //NOFORN

(TS// //NF) Based on a report from CTC, the CIA Office of Inspector General conducted a review of these interrogation incidents, and issued a report of investigation in the fall of 2003.[1] The Office of Inspector General later described additional allegations of unauthorized techniques used against al-Nashiri by   [CIA OFFICER 2] and other interrogators, including slapping al-Nashiri multiple times on the back of the head during interrogations; implying that his mother would be brought before him and sexually abused; blowing cigar smoke in al-Nashiri's face; giving al-Nashiri a forced bath using a stiff brush; and using improvised stress positions that caused cuts and bruises resulting in the intervention of a medical officer, who was concerned that al-Nashiri's shoulders would be dislocated using the stress positions.[2] When interviewed by the Office of Inspector General, the DETENTION SITE BLUE chief of Base stated he did not object to using the gun and drill in the interrogations because he believed   [CIA OFFICER 2] was sent from CIA Headquarters "to resolve the matter of al-Nashiri's cooperation" and that he believed   [CIA OFFICER 2] had permission to use the interrogation techniques.[3] The chief of Base added that his own on-site approval was based on this and "the pressure he felt from Headquarters to obtain imminent threat information from al-Nashiri on 9/11-style attacks."[4] In April 2004,   [CIA OFFICER 2] and the chief of Base were disciplined.[5]

==== 3. CIA Contractor Recommends Continued Use of the CIA's Enhanced Interrogation Techniques Against Al-Nashiri; Chief Interrogator Threatens to Quit Because Additional Techniques Might "Push [Al-Nashiri] Over The Edge Psychologically," Refers to the CIA Program As a "Train Wreak [sic] Waiting to Happen" ====


  1. CIA Office of Inspector General, Report of Investigation: Unauthorized Interrogation Techniques at [DETENTION SITE BLUE], (2003-7123-IG), October 29, 2003.
  2. CIA Office of Inspector General, Special Review – Counterterrorism Detention and Interrogation Program, (2003-7123-IG), May 2004.
  3. CIA Office of Inspector General, Report of Investigation: Unauthorized Interrogation Techniques at [DETENTION SITE BLUE], (2003-7123-IG), October 29, 2003.
  4. CIA Office of Inspector General, Report of Investigation: Unauthorized Interrogation Techniques at [DETENTION SITE BLUE], (2003-7123-IG), October 29, 2003.
  5.   [CIA OFFICER 2] received a one-year Letter of Reprimand, was suspended for five days without pay, and was prohibited from promotions, within-grade step increases, quality step increases, or permanent salary increases during that one-year period. The decision did not affect   [CIA OFFICER 2's] eligiblity to receive Exceptional Performance Awards, bonuses, or non-monetary forms of recognition. See  .   [CIA OFFICER 2] retired from the CIA on  , 2004. (See  .) On June 20, 2005, the CIA director of transnational issues, aware of   [CIA OFFICER 2's] problematic background, approved   [CIA OFFICER 2's] employment on a CIA contract because the project was "mission critical" and "no other contractor with the needed skills was available." (See  .) The chief of Base received a two-year Letter of Reprimand and a ten-day suspension without pay, and was prohibited from receiving any bonus awards from the CIA during the period of reprimand. On  , 2003, prior to the implementation of the prohibitions, this individual retired from the CIA. See  .

TOP SECRET// //NOFORN
Page 70 of 499

UNCLASSIFIED