Talk:On Physical Lines of Force

I believe this paper as being remarkable since it was done without the clue that has been hidden for so long regarding propagation. The Gaussian theory is well known with respect to statics and boundary rules. What has not been fully understood is the statement by Feynman where he declares that what goes for static boundaries also goes for dynamic boundaries. Thus one can add a time varying current and elements to make a dynamic boundary in equilibrium from the Gaussian law of statics. This step reveals that with this addition Maxwell's equations for propagation is now applicable. This agrees to what the above paper reveals: The presence of static particles as the carrier of charge. Levitation provided by the displacement current when it produces vortices is a part of propergation. The required equilibrium requirement demands that if lumped loads are present they must be effectively cancelled It shows that Faradays work on the cage effectivelly shows the ability of separation of time varying current, time varying fields electric and megnetic, which applies or removes charge from accelerated or decellerated particles. To present a paper without the clues provided by accepted Gauss and Maxwell and without the introduction of new rules to justifyspeculated theory is truly astonishing, especially with the presence of the duallity theorem that has retarded progress on radiation for so long. Arthur H Unwin Unwinantennas.com/

Maxwell's careful to question all of his own assumptions, not for the reader, but it sounds like he just did this out of habit and he invites you into his process of thinking. This is hands down the most effective, informative and absolutely thought provoking thing I've ever read. There are no jumps from one idea to the next and there are no holes in the logic. The equations are so numerous but some how at the same time digestible and they never include overly symbolic representations. In the end I felt like he was making it look easy, not giving himself any credit for what he had done. What remains is a structure that's so irreducible and agreeable.. Maxwell has earned his place as the best in my book

Correction

• He refers to another source of information to form his core mathematical operation about electricity being the total movement and magnetism the relative movement very early. Is he referring to the professor in that paragraph? Himself as the author? It's important to ask because all Maxwell's equations would rest on this and it's also such a clear case of using a relativistic model so early

Yo, this:

"The lines of force belonging to 13"

should be replaced with:

"The lines of force belonging to B"

See page 170 of : PDF. 63.225.249.166 06:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks.

Fwiw... You could fix these yourself btw. Clicking on the [170] in the left-hand margin in this case would have sent you to the text. You should check it out. -- George Orwell III (talk) 06:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

---

There is an error equation in (77) P = mu.gamma.d"y"/dt instead of d"x"/dt

Thanks. Fixed. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 19:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)