User talk:Cowardly Lion: Difference between revisions

From Wikisource
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Jayvdb in topic Sysop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Cowardly Lion (talk | contribs)
→‎Sysop: Thank you
John Vandenberg (talk | contribs)
→‎Sysop: congrats, and a place where you can swing that mop freely
Line 82: Line 82:
You have been appointed :)--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 17:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
You have been appointed :)--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 17:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
:Thank you, and thanks to everyone who supported me! [[User:Cowardly Lion|Cowardly Lion]] 23:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
:Thank you, and thanks to everyone who supported me! [[User:Cowardly Lion|Cowardly Lion]] 23:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Congrats. Now, for some easy work to get started on, [[:Category:Orphan media]] contains images that are not in use.

Most of them are mathematics symbols that have been replaced with "wiki-maths"; the diffs are [http://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Relativity:_The_Special_and_General_Theory&diff=437351&oldid=437339 this] and [http://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Relativity:_The_Special_and_General_Theory&diff=prev&oldid=468827 that]. These have been checked; all you need to do is hit the delete button at the top of each image, and write a blurb to say why you are deleting them.

[[:Image:Days of War Nights of Love title page.jpg]] of [[Days of War, Nights of Love]] doesnt have a license and it is an artistic photograph due to the funky positioning, etc; it has been discussed in two locations: [[Special:Whatlinkshere/Image:Days_of_War_Nights_of_Love_title_page.jpg]]. You may want to chat with the uploader about it, but it's not been in use so there is little damage done by deleting it. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:Jayvdb|chat]])'''</sup></span> 00:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:18, 26 January 2008

Hello, Cowardly Lion, welcome to Wikisource! Thanks for your interest in the project; we hope you'll enjoy the community and your work here. If you need help, see our help pages (especially Adding texts and Wikisource's style guide). You can discuss or ask questions from the community in general at the Scriptorium. The Community Portal lists tasks you can help with if you wish. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page.

You're doing great work thusfar, let me know if you need any help! Sherurcij Collaboration of the Week: Author:Winston Churchill 22:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the welcome. I'll drop you a line if I need any help. Cowardly Lion 23:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Middlemarch is looking good. I prefer to keep the categories at the top, near the header, but you are free to add them anywhere. We dont have rules about those sort of things.

Could you edit Talk:Middlemarch to record the source that you are using, and if possible, the edition of the physical book that is being contributed.

Also, when you have time could you edit Cowardly Lion, mentioning any other Wikimedia projects you are heavily involved in, any foreign languages you understand, and what types of works you are interested in. John Vandenberg 01:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Done. Cowardly Lion 01:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Things

It's always a good idea to check the page history, to make sure they weren't vandalising a legitimate text first, then add {{sdelete}} to the page, and an admin will delete it (typically within 24 hours). It may also be wise to check the other "contributions" by the vandalising user, and see if they've done the same to other texts. Thanks for the heads-up! Sherurcij Collaboration of the Week: Author:Abu Hamid al-Ghazālī 21:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I'll keep all that in mind for the future. Cowardly Lion 22:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Depuzzling

Due to a recent change in the Wiki set up, normal users are now being given access to the "patrol" functionality. You can read more about it here Wikisource:Scriptorium#Patrolling by non-admins. John Vandenberg 19:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for telling me about that page. I've taken my other questions there. Cowardly Lion 20:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

:-)

Thank you for your congrats. I've noticed your work when I click on Recent changes and I see that you are doing much to help out here. Glad to have you on board. Let me know if I can help. Take care, FloNight 11:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Opinion

Fielding opinions on splitting Wikisource:United States into separate sub-indices for the individual states. If we google/search, we can find four or five existing WS works for each state, and can then link to offsite PD texts for each one as well. The United States is fairly unique in its citizens having a great deal of patriotism to their individual state - thus a new member from Texas is more likely to contribute to Wikisource:Texas than they are to help with Wikisource:United States. Thoughts? Sherurcij Collaboration of the Week: Author:Arthur Schopenhauer 06:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Slavedriver is such a harsh term, I prefer "very motivating man with a whip". In reality, basically it comes down to a question of whether I'm the one who welcomes you to WS when you first join - if I do, you're automatically "stalked" on my watchlist and I see the improvements you do - and thus can tailor my "hints" and suggestions to fit active people who seem to have niche interests. :) Sherurcij Collaboration of the Week: Author:Haile Selassie 20:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Beware Sherurcij's whip! Oh, I mean, his effective motivational techniques. Quadell (talk/swapmeet) 15:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Very Well

I understand.--Angel of the Lord 02:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

patrolling

Thanks for helping with patrolling; I see you are catching some problems already.

Tight-lacing does need a header, so I have tagged it. Pages in the "Page:" namespace dont have headers, and we dont have any established style guidelines for "Index:" pages like Index:Tight-lacing.

I have drafted a help page for patrolling: Help:Patrolling. John Vandenberg 07:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

a diff to check

Hi, what do you think of this diff ? John Vandenberg 23:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, I've never seen "desolate place", with definite or indefinite article. The page The Tragedy of Macbeth seems to have started off with "an open place", but that was changed to "an desert place" by an anon in February 2006. (I've never seen that either.) That was changed a year later by another anon to "an desolate place". I don't claim to be such an expert as to be able to state categorically that there are no sources which have "desert" or "desolate", but my copy of The Norton Shakespeare (1997) states that the First Folio is the only authoritative source, and that the Norton Shakespeare is consequently based on it. It further states that scholars generally agree that the version in the First Folio was based on a promptbook. The Norton Shakespeare gives "Location: An open place" as a footnote to Act One, Scene One. Interestingly, the version in the First Folio (you can see my photo here) doesn't give any kind of location — desert, desolate, or open, even if you blow up the photo! Also, The Norton Shakespeare has a "Textual Variants" section at the end of each play, listing differences between sources, and it says nothing about any other versions that might have "desert" or "desolate". I've changed it to "open". Cowardly Lion 00:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Lovely. John Vandenberg 01:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

another to be checked. John Vandenberg 08:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I reverted that one. The extract that was added had just been copied and pasted from another section in the same play. The list of characters was modified, but as long as the characters are all named correctly, I don't think that really matters. The earliest source for Twelfth Night is the First Folio, which doesn't have a Dramatis personae. I think later editions just added a list of characters to the beginning of the plays, so there are generally variations; some might say "uncle", while others say "kinsman". Some editions list the characters in order of appearance; older editions seem to list the men first and then the women. I tidied the list up a bit, and didn't bother about sticking to any particular version, since there is no "authentic" one. Cowardly Lion 02:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

For future reference

Just so you don't have to hunt it down in the future, you're looking for {{|translation license|original={{PD-old-70}}|translation={{PD-1923}}}} Sherurcij Collaboration of the Week: Wikisource:Sheet music 18:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that. It can be annoying when I need something and I know I've come across it somewhere but can't remember where! Cowardly Lion 21:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Admin nomination

Hi, my apologies if you are not interested, but since it is getting too easy, I have nominated you for adminship to give you a new set of problems to wrap your head around: Wikisource:Administrators#Cowardly Lion. Thanks for your prolonged efforts keeping those dastardly red exclamation marks at bay.

Simply decline the request if you dont wish to take this on at this time. Cheers, John Vandenberg 15:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well thank you! It's probably too soon, but I've accepted since it won't upset me if it's unsuccessful, and I can try again later if people think I should wait. As for those annoying red exclamation marks, since the worst offender, who used to produce hundreds within a few hours, has now, thankfully, been promoted and won't be able to produce any more, I may have time to import more texts here instead of patrolling so much! Cowardly Lion 17:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

For your terrific work on Beatrix Potter books (and others), I award you this shiny new barnstar. Keep up the good work! —Quadell (talk / swapmeet) 15:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. That's very kind. I intend to continue with the other Beatrix Potter books, though I'm a bit busy this week, and it may have to wait until next week. Hopefully when I get more time I'll be able to join in with the proofreading as well. It's a great idea. Cowardly Lion 01:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

wiktionary

A knowledgeable/experienced wiktionary user has responded to my query about Old/Middle English. It sounds like we should concentrate on Old English works, in order to work in an area that interests him while we learn a little and build up the word list. John Vandenberg (chat) 10:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that. I registered at Wiktionary a few weeks ago, but haven't contributed yet. I do think it's a great idea to be able to link to definitions of any obscure, archaic words, though I'm a little surprised that Anglo Saxon works are here rather than at Anglo Saxon Wikisource. I agree with Widsith in considering it to be a separate language, and feel there should at least be a Wikisource (or previously-published PD) modern English translation for works that are hosted here. Unfortunately, I can't volunteer for the job, though - my knowledge of Anglo Saxon is very limited. (I've altered the link to Widsith's response, as it was to the most current version of your talk page, so is no longer valid.) Cowardly Lion 01:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sysop

You have been appointed :)--BirgitteSB 17:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, and thanks to everyone who supported me! Cowardly Lion 23:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congrats. Now, for some easy work to get started on, Category:Orphan media contains images that are not in use.

Most of them are mathematics symbols that have been replaced with "wiki-maths"; the diffs are this and that. These have been checked; all you need to do is hit the delete button at the top of each image, and write a blurb to say why you are deleting them.

Image:Days of War Nights of Love title page.jpg of Days of War, Nights of Love doesnt have a license and it is an artistic photograph due to the funky positioning, etc; it has been discussed in two locations: Special:Whatlinkshere/Image:Days_of_War_Nights_of_Love_title_page.jpg. You may want to chat with the uploader about it, but it's not been in use so there is little damage done by deleting it. John Vandenberg (chat) 00:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply