Wikisource talk:Scriptorium/Help
Latest comment: 8 years ago by EncycloPetey in topic Archiving? and annoying spambot
Please make any requests on the project page. This discussion page is for discussion of the page itself.
Backlog cleared?
[edit]I think I cleared the backlog, can somone please check if it's actually cleared and remove the template? -- Nevuchadnezzar 03:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think we need to make an archive to clear the page.--BirgitteSB 15:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Archiving? and annoying spambot
[edit]- I'm trying to add a comment to an archive of this page from 10 days ago, and being stopped by a spam bot. I gave up, but thought it wise to tell you here. I realise you have to keep this page to a reasonable size, but at least in my case its not helpful. I could not add this comment either to the project page so Ive posted it here. Hope its me ... Victuallers (talk) 18:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- Archiving is done after 31 days. In any case, comments should not be posted to an archive. No one will see them. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- User:Victuallers, Please try your edit again. It does appear that a abuse filter added earlier today has affected some of the valid edit attempts made (yours included) since its introduction inadvertently. I disabled it for now - or at least until it's owner comes back around and notices my status change. -- George Orwell III (talk) 02:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks George. In reply to @EncycloPetey - "No one will see them" ?? Then why not delete all the archives? I have had valid conversations with editors well after 10 days of the last posting. I think your "No one will see them" needs to be studied more closely as its clearly not 100% true. My attention was drawn by another editor to an archive. Your comments were made 5-6 days ago now and I have just seen them - and I think I'm a fairly frequent visitor to this project. Victuallers (talk) 08:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- But this page is not an archive. Archives are meant to preserve copies of old discussion in case they are needed in future for reference. They are not intended to be active areas of discussion. My point is that the Wikisource community can (and does) watch the Scriptorium. The community does not keep tabs on all the various archive pages of every previous discussion. The archives are like a filing box stuck in a warehouse; adding a note to the box makes it unlikely to be seen. --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks George. In reply to @EncycloPetey - "No one will see them" ?? Then why not delete all the archives? I have had valid conversations with editors well after 10 days of the last posting. I think your "No one will see them" needs to be studied more closely as its clearly not 100% true. My attention was drawn by another editor to an archive. Your comments were made 5-6 days ago now and I have just seen them - and I think I'm a fairly frequent visitor to this project. Victuallers (talk) 08:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)