Talk:Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search

George Smith by John Collier.jpg

Wikisource has a number of active Wikiprojects that could use
your help in tackling these large additions to our library.


Dictionary of National Biography Project
Work: Dictionary of National Biography

Information about this edition
Edition:
Source: (see below)
Contributor(s): Wikisource:WikiProject DNB
Level of progress: Wikisource:WikiProject DNB/Progress
Notes:
Proofreaders:

Sources[edit]

The sources for the original 63 volumes are available as scanned images at Archive.org and have been uploaded to wikisource:

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

61 62 63

Linking to these articles[edit]

  • From Wikipedia: Use {{Cite DNB}} or {{DNB Poster}}. Where DNB text is used in the WP article use {{DNB}} to create a proper attribution link; this template should be filled in when the WS article is created (not before, given that there is a maintenance category prompting creation of the required WS articles and depending on the absence of piping).
  • From Wikisource author pages: Use {{DNB Link}} to link a single article: this gives a full reference. For bulleted lists of articles use {{DNB lkpl}} to create links that are "plain" (i.e. they do not repeat the full reference).

DNB Wikisource layout[edit]

I'm arbitrarily copying the EB1911 layout. It may not be perfect for the DNB but it's a fairly good match and it's a lot easier than starting from scratch. Please feel free to change it as you see fit, or discuss it. With the exception of this comment, please use this talk page to discuss the Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900 main page itself, and use Wikisource talk:WikiProject DNB to discuss the project in general, Unless we decide differently.We will attempt to capture project guidelines and policy at Wikisource:WikiProject DNB -Arch dude (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Proofreading[edit]

Hi, I was just taking a look at the pages to be proofread, and the quantity of the work to be done. What are the prospects of completing the proofreading project here on Wikisource? Distributed Proofreaders, as some of you will know, is dedicated to this sort of work. It presents a scanned side along with OCR-generated text for people to proofread, and this is done on a page-by-page basis. There are several rounds of proofreading and formatting, before the whole volume is complete. The system is quite robust and produces accurate and formatted texts. Similar large-scale projects on DP include proofreading 1911 Britannica. Although DP has official ties with Project Gutenberg, would anyone here support pooling efforts with DP users to get through this large and important work? Has anyone worked at Distributed Proofreaders before? --OldakQuill (talk) 19:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikisource has a similar ability and we have scans from various sources and of various quality at Wikisource:WikiProject DNB/Djvu files and that is how some we have been undertaking some of the work. Our project Wikisource:WikiProject DNB allows users to free transcribe, or to proofread and transclude the text from the images. -- billinghurst (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for that link. I had seen some Djvu files here previously, but I hadn't seen that coordination page and the information about embedded OCR text. --OldakQuill (talk) 03:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

For Vol. 39, a series of pages is marked with # as proofread, but these are redirects to pages globbed together from several projects and non-projects, at least the few I have inspected. I think the DNB content should be extracted and copied to the current redirect pages. I am doing this for the EB1911 content where it hasn't been done already. I have also put together the templates w:Template:DNB Poster and w:Template:DNB Cite in Wikipedia for linking to the DNB material. I couldn't find anything to do this, and linking to these globbed pages, as is being done currently, seems rather sloppy to me. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done billinghurst (talk) 06:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

typography[edit]

Since I don't know how to do it without screwing up the templates and links and stuff, someone with a good grasp of and on Wikisource's formal side please change all instances where hyphens are incorrectly used in place of dashes (like, "1885-1900" is wrong, it should be "1885–1900"). Thanks – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 13:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)