User talk:Stolengood
Welcome to Wikisource
Hello, Stolengood, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- Help pages, especially for proofreading
- Help:Beginner's guide to Wikisource
- Style guide
- Inclusion policy
- Wikisource:For Wikipedians
You may be interested in participating in
Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.
You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.
Have questions? Then please ask them at either
I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.
Again, welcome! -- billinghurst (talk) 15:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
speech[edit]
I made some changes to the text, revert them if you don't agree. Unless you have a better source, you could mark it as 
complete I reckon. Regards, Cygnis insignis (talk) 19:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for notifying me. Stolengood (talk) 08:34, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hi again, I'm marking it as 'text being edited', this is a rough timeline: 1. Another user has said it was not proofread by any other than yourself, not accurate but anyway ... 2. You made some changes to the text that do not appear in the source. 3. I then restored the transcription from the site provided, I reckon this is what we do here. The images don't appear either, not our role to add them I reckon. 4. You made changes to the text that do not appear in the source. 5. I notified you that if you agreed you could mark it as 100%; I didn't make that explicitly clear, apologies for that. 6. You reverted my proofread document to your version, then marked it 100%. 7. I marked it as above because your actions, and mine, and the third party, have made the document unstable. 8 You switched it back. 9. I undid that again.
I anticipate your rationale for changing and adding to a document from the verbatim text provided. Do you perhaps have access to a different source or the original document? I would also suggest instead a wikipedia article on the original document would be notable and has the scope for these changes, if that is what they are, I just go with what we are given - literally. Cygnis insignis (talk) 17:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi again, I'm marking it as 'text being edited', this is a rough timeline: 1. Another user has said it was not proofread by any other than yourself, not accurate but anyway ... 2. You made some changes to the text that do not appear in the source. 3. I then restored the transcription from the site provided, I reckon this is what we do here. The images don't appear either, not our role to add them I reckon. 4. You made changes to the text that do not appear in the source. 5. I notified you that if you agreed you could mark it as 100%; I didn't make that explicitly clear, apologies for that. 6. You reverted my proofread document to your version, then marked it 100%. 7. I marked it as above because your actions, and mine, and the third party, have made the document unstable. 8 You switched it back. 9. I undid that again.