User talk:UndercoverClassicist

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikisource

Hello, UndercoverClassicist, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

You may be interested in participating in

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! --Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Organisation of Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography

[edit]

Hi,

I see that you are changing a bit the organisation of Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography. I don't mind but first let's talk, see what is the problem with the current model and then let's apply a solution consistently, shall we? (we may want indeed to delete and merge but let's do it for all dozen of pages, not just the letter R ;) ).

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi - I've been trying not to change the current system, though I might not have understood it properly. It looks to me like most of the letter groups are simply sections of the Volume 2 page; "R" is an outlier in that it's got its own subpage. As I could see it, there are two different systems in use: the problem was that the "R" entries weren't listed in the "Volume II" page, whereas all the other were. I tried to effect a compromise by making a transclusion of the "R" page. What's the system "supposed" to be? UndercoverClassicist (talk) 12:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, true, there is two differents systems.
But R is not alone, there is other subpages:
To be honest, I'm also not sure what to do... I fear that listing all the entries on a single page would be too much (see how Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography/Volume I only with a small part of the letter A). What do you think ?
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I hadn't seen the pages for Volume 1. I suppose that landing page that you linked fulfils the same function as a book's index: yes, it's long, but readers will generally be looking for a specific term rather than browsing casually, and be able to find that thing in even a very long alphabetical list fairly easily. Certainly for Volume 2, where we've only proofread a comparatively small part, I can't see any concern in the length of that landing page, and so would suggest that forcing readers to navigate to a subpage imposes an extra level of friction for no real benefit. Perhaps transcluding gives us the best of both: readers then have the option to navigate straight to a small page for a single letter, or else to scroll down or browse the "index"? UndercoverClassicist (talk) 19:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I'll trust you. Tell me if you want any help. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply