User talk:EugeneZelenko

From Wikisource
Latest comment: 3 years ago by LorickIsBoyThatStopDeleted in topic Apology Message (For EugeneZelenko for messing up)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[edit]

What the hell is wrong with you? Why would you delete a logo that is not even yours!!

File in question was non-trivial organization logo. Please read c:Commons:Licensing. In future please discuss Commons matters there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Two years later...

[edit]

The Way of the Cross is OCR'd. Sorry that took so long, I wasn't even aware of the OCR WikiProject until yesterday. It is now at Index:The Way of the Cross, Doroshevich, tr. Graham, 1916.djvu, and Doroshevich has an author page at Author:Vlas Mikhaĭlovich Doroshevich. Cheers, Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 17:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for help! However I learned that w:Stephen Graham (author) is British author, so his work still copyrighted in country of origin. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Curses! It can, however, still be hosted at WS, since WS has no requirement of being PD in the country of origin, just in the US (and pre-1923 is very helpful in that respect). I will move the file over tomorrow, and request a deletion at Commons. Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 04:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I personally doesn't agree with USA-centrism of international project and don't think it's right policy. Especially if taking in account traffic and servers beyond USA, including mirrors like ToolServer. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Please do not delete from Commons. See discussion. --Mpaa (talk) 20:19, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
This discussion is irrelevant. Translator died in 1975 and country of origin is United Kingdom. Book is taken from Google Books, so you could easily re-upload it locally (if project allow this). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
It needs to be restored and brought here, you should have migrated it to here instead of deleting it. Please restore it to this project.--Doug.(talk contribs) 19:01, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
We got it, Please think about sending works that are supporting indices to the wikisource projects in the future, this really makes a mess of things.--Doug.(talk contribs) 00:33, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, but I think it should not be uploaded on Commons in first place. There is something to consider to WikiSource contributors too. I have my own opinion about ProofRead extension (and it overhead) and it usefulness, but it's irrelevant in this case :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

???

[edit]

Приветствую!

Евгений почему вы решили удалить мои файлы? я что-то нарушил? я просто ещё новичок тут, выб лучше помогли разобраться прежде чем что-то удалять(((

Во многих странах, включая страны бывшего СССР, скульптуры охраняются авторскими правами и их фотографии крупным планом нельзя использовать коммерческих целях без разрешения скульптора. Смотрите w:ru:Википедия:Свобода панорамы.
Подобные вопросы лучше задавать на месте загрузки :-)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: The deletion of Teenage-survival-handbook-cover-ben-wicks.png image

[edit]

I have requested an undelete/restore request as well. This is a company owned image, and I am uploading on behalf of the company (regional maple leaf communications). Please let me know what should be done to get the iamge restored ASAP.

Please ask publisher to send permission (see commons:Commons:Email templates as example to commons:Commons:OTRS). Then you could use commons:Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to make process faster.
Please use relevant project next time to discuss issues happened there.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Возражения

[edit]

Протестую, уважаемый Евгений, чтоб я так жил! Умничать на чужом материале - наблатыкаться нивапрос ни разу. Пальцы гнуть погодите-ка. Вас загрызают сомнения относительно подлинности используемых мною работ для иллюстрации статей? И да, я вам со всей ответственностью заявляю, что это - таки мой собственный личный архив. И даже многие из снимков сделаны мной собственноручно. Удивлены? Я пишу о людях, с которыми не просто знаюсь лично, НО: один из этих замечательных людей - часть моей семьи, со вторым нас связывает долгая многолетняя дружба, профессия и совместная работа. Неужели вы думаете, что без личного согласия авторов эти файлы каким-то загадочным образом телепортируются на мой компьютер с их собственных машин? И много у вас самого таких примеров? Может, поройтесь - и отыщете на своем компе чего подобного? И с каких таких пор личный архив не является моей-размоей собственностью? Ах, ё-моё, "small/inconsistent resolutions, different cameras"! - и да, как вы думаете, почему это камеры различны, если человек использует их в разные временные отрезки целой своей жизни, и как вы таки думаете ещё, почему это resolutions is small, ежели я готовлю публикацию для интернета? И смею заметить, согласитесь, что чудесная Вики даже не оставляет выбора, кроме как заявлять из прав "my own work", и лицензию "CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication, all rights waived". Паблик домен, на минуточку! Таки скажите спасибо за передачу в общественное достояние. А за авторские права - я вас умоляю! - это без мазы. Вы тут предлагаете использовать "запрос на разрешение у автора". Наверное, хорошая мысль, ясен пень. Да только вот: Чудесная процедура конфирмации via Commons:OTRS - она каким дивным образом происходит? А так вы, Евгений, конечно, бравый малый, фраер и все такое. Нежно жму вашу руку, о рыцарь и защитник справедливости. Прошу прощения за резкий тон - но думать таки надо! Origati (talk) 06:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Передавать в общественное достояние может только автор. Судя по Вашим словам, таковым Вы в некоторых случаях не являетесь. Стандартная процедура в таких случаях - OTRS (образец).
Если Вы сделали фотографии - Вы можете загрузить их в полном разрешении, чтобы подтвердить Ваше авторство.
Настоятельная просьба: на будущее обсуждать проблемы в том проекте, где они случились. И очень желательно без эмоций.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Проблема с копирайтами

[edit]

Привет. Я стартонул топик https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_Strike_Portable Я один из разработчиков данной игры. Изображения я рисовал и обрабатывал сам. Но мои изображения не проходят по какимто правам. Все картинки что я делал делались для соц сетей и wiki. В соц сети добавились без проблем, сюда не понятно. Подскажите что мне делать. Прошу не удалять картинки, через 3 дня буду в головном офисе в Финляндии и оттуда отправим картинки... Спасибо.

Пожалуйста, попросите юридический отдел послать разрешение в commons:Commons:OTRS (пример: commons:Commons:Email templates) или подтверждение того, что авторские права Вами фирме не передавались. Потом Вы можете попросить помощи на commons:Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения и восстановлением изображения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:58, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

HELP

[edit]

Hello, Please may you help on page fr.Biennale internationale de peinture d'enfants, on image. Thank you.--AlexArago (talk) 18:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Uenotaira: photo flagged

[edit]

Photograph was taken by the author (no photo ownership issues). Subject is a public signboard on a trail (protected categories in Japan are artworks and buildings; this is neither). Respectfully suggest no grounds for deletion. 80.192.70.199 14:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Could you please specify file in question? Please use Commons talk page next time. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Helena Espinosa Berea

[edit]

They wrote us Permissions - in Spanish <permissions-es@wikimedia.org> thanking for the photo of Helena Espinosa Berea. They put a message of permission accepted, but the photo still has the deletion template Can you remove it please? Permission to use this work has been archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system. The permit is available as a ticket # 2017032010029252 for users with an OTRS account. If you wish to reuse this work elsewhere, please read the instructions here. If you are a Commons user and wish to confirm the permission, please leave a note on the OTRS bulletin board.

Link to permission: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2017032010029252

Original en español: Nos escribieron de Permissions - in Spanish <permissions-es@wikimedia.org> dando las gracias por la foto de Helena Espinosa Berea. Pusieron un mensaje del permiso aceptado, pero la foto sigue teniendo la plantilla de borrado ¿Puede quitarla por favor?

El permiso para el uso de esta obra se ha archivado en el sistema de Wikimedia OTRS. El permiso está disponible como tícket #2017032010029252 para usuarios con una cuenta en OTRS. Si deseas reutilizar esta obra en otro lugar, por favor lee las instrucciones aquí. Si eres usuario de Commons y deseas confirmar el permiso, por favor deja una nota en el tablón de anuncios de OTRS (en inglés).

Enlace al permiso: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2017032010029252

--201.103.145.18 11:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I don't have OTRS access, so please use commons:Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard.
Please use Commons talk page for Commons-related discussions in future.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rábold Gusztáv

[edit]

Miért kéri fotóim törlését. Saját készítésű fotók nagyapám munkásságához kapcsolódóan. Szerzői jogutód vagyokRábold Gusztáv (talk) 18:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I don't know Hungarian :-( When did you grandfather died? Who created illustration? Who made photo? Please read commons:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Hungary (if all these works were made there) to find out if works are in public domain. In future please discuss Commons problems there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

== Rábold Gusztáv =nem értem miként keveredtem ide. Kezdő vagyok a wikipédián. A képeket oda szántamRábold Gusztáv (talk) 18:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC) A képeket én készítettem. Nagyapámról minden információ fent van a wikipédián.Reply

Several photos are commons:Commons:Derivative works from book pages. Who are authors of text and illustrations? Photo of you grandfather looks taken in 1930s (I may be mistaken in that). Who is original photographer? Scanning/making photo of photo doesn't make you an author of original work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

DELETION OF MY UPLOADED FILES ????

[edit]

Dear Eugene,

[edit]

I´d be very glad you remove my 2 books uploaded in this site. These two books are written by me. Ergo: I am the Owner.

Anyway, I wanted to leave Wikipedia. Could you remove my books ASAP, and my Page please. All the files that name me please.

I am looking forward to see your efficient work

Best Regards


Hernán Precht Bañados

I nominated your files for deletion, because Wikibooks is much better place for such projects as well as wiki-text is better then PDF for expanding content and fixing mistakes. Other potential problem with files is origin of images. Please also use Commons pages to discuss problem on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Index:Canadian_Singers_and_Their_Songs.djvu

[edit]

If you are going to nominate files for copyright reasons on Commons, at least have the courtesy to let Wikisource administrators know about the potential deletion so the files can be migrated to local version if possible. I had concerns about this work previously, but the consensus at WS:CV (Wikisource:Copyright_discussions#Index:Canadian_Singers_and_Their_Songs.djvu_ was that it was PD in the US, and hence a local version of the file would have been acceptable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

File uploader was aware of deletion. He/she could take care about notification on Wikisource. Please read commons:Commons:Licensing carefully: works should be in public domain in country of origin and USA. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
I am well aware of that policy (as a long-time contributor). However, I've been told (sometimes rather firmly) by other administrators here in respect of more than one previous Index : and File:, that if I nominated something on Commons, which is used extensively here, that I as the nominator need to let this project know, so that ALL the relevant associated pages can be reviewed locally, and appropriate measures taken BEFORE a file is deleted on Commons. Unilateral actions at Commons, are not conducive to encouraging contributors here. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, this was never policy on Commons. Contributors are also should not upload files that doesn't violate Commons copyrights requirements. May be bot run by Wikisource administrator(s) is best solution. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Second opinion needed...

[edit]

https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?target=Balajijagadesh&namespace=106&tagfilter=&newOnly=1&start=&end=&limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions

I have concerns about some of these being hosted on Commons. Perhaps you could do a quick review as you seem to be more familar with Commons policy right now? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Important factors are: country of origin, dates of life of author(s)(editor(s), translator(s))/date of publication, depending on country of origin. From my Commons experience I could tell that Indian books uploaders often forget to specify such data. Country-specific laws could be found on commons:Commons:Copyright rules by territory.
In this particluar case more data is needed for (I checked only Wikisource descriptions):
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Towarzystwo Pomost i "Międzymorze"

[edit]

Panie Eugeniuszu

W wypadku ulotki "Towarzystwa Pomost" sprawa jest jasna - jest to ulotka z tekstem podpisanym przez 2 osoby z nieistniejącego już stowarzyszenia, ono było autorem i z racji rozpowszechniania tejże udziela "domniemanej zgody" wszystkim na rozpowszechnianie. W drugim - okładka pisma podziemnego ("Międzymorze" 1987). Ja byłem redaktorem i to z tej racji ja mam do tego prawa.Barnim1964 (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I don't know Polish well enough to write on it :-( You need to get author's permission for poster. What concern magazine cover: did you draw cover or it was drawn by other person? Please also read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland. P. S. Please discuss Commons matters at Commons in future. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Solicitud de supresión BUSCAR TRABAJO CON EL MÓVIL.pdf

[edit]

Excuse me. I have try to delete this message but I can not.

Good afternoon I would like to know the reasons why you have requested the deletion of the file. It can be useful for many people here in Spain and it is totally original.

It is the first time that I upload something to Wikisource; if I need to change something, I would appreciate it if you could tell me. Greetings

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Please read c:Commons:Project scope. In future please discuss Commons matters there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:21, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Request to delete the file "Buscar trabajo con el móvil"

[edit]

Good afternoon I would like to know the reasons why you have requested the deletion of the file. The book is totally original and it can be useful for many people here in Spain. I have search but i can not fin the reassons to delete it. It is the first time that I upload something to Wikisource; if I need to change something, I would appreciate it if you could tell me. Greetings

Please read answer above. You uploaded file to Wikimedia Commons, not English Wikisource. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Some help

[edit]

Hi not sure if this is the right place to ask this question (it's a little confusing for me) so apologies if I've got this wrong. I see however that you've deleted media that I uploaded stating copyright - however I'm confused re this. I wrote to the owner of the media and was granted permission to use these - is this not sufficient? Or is there another process to upload in these situations. Ever image I have used has been given permission to use, after I formally contacted the individual concerned and advised that I was creating articles on his theories. Veracity000 (talk) 12:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Permission must be verifiable by other people. So it must be available on Internet or in c:commons:OTRS (example: c:Commons:Email templates). In future please discuss Commons matters there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:4.1.0. Схема маршрутов 2020 декабрь 5 до Конева.png

[edit]

Здравствуйте, Евгений. Уже в третий раз я получаю предупреждение по данному файлу (вы в этот раз добавили ещё и вопрос по всем предыдущим загруженным мною файлам), который касается авторства (полного или частичного) данных изображений. Я самостоятельно полностью отрисовал все эти файлы в векторном редакторе. Всё, включая лого и изображение земной поверхности - моя работа (для карты использовался старый космоснимок низкого разрешения с бесплатного ресурса много лет назад). Можете проверить сайт официального перевозчика - ничего даже близко подобного у них нет (http://www.irkget.ru/). Именно их полное безразличие к имеющимся схемам и сподвигло меня провести много часов за созданием собственных иллюстраций для Википедии. Скажите, что конкретно требуется указать в Источниках, потому как каждый раз предлагать отправить мои собственные векторные исходники для доказательства того, что работа моя - это не выход - следующий проверяющий начинает вывешивать предупреждение на удаление, и меня это уже порядком утомило :((( Если никакого постоянного решения нет, то мне проще удалить эти файлы, чем снова и снова получать эти предупреждения. С уважением.

Вы не могли бы уточнить про старый космоснимок низкого разрешения с бесплатного ресурса (что за ресурс, лицензия)? И это надо отразить в описании ко всем изображениям. А https://openstreetmap.org не может быть использован в качестве основы (с лицензией там всё правильно)? В будущем, пожалуйста, обсуждайте проблемы, связанные с Викискладом, там же. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Every Time That If got deleted by EugeneZelenko

[edit]

This is the message to you who blocked me as a main channel. Seriously, i have seriously. Not means that you not helping. Why? Because you just got deleted The Jesus Music and Show Me The Father? You know this is not yours. If you understand then, you will be good but you blocked me for not understand then you will be not good at all. Understand? LorickIsBoyThatStopDeleted (talk) 02:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Are you c:User:Lorick2021? If so, please read c:Commons:Licensing carefully. By the word, you was already pointed to this page several times. If you'll not follow basic rules of project, you'll be blocked again. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deal Eugene LorickIsBoyThatStopDeleted (talk) 04:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Apology Message (For EugeneZelenko for messing up)

[edit]

Regarding that if follows rules that i will stop messing with Eugene Zelenko. I'm sorry about this things if dont block me again. But if you block me again, thats fine and its people will okay. So please understand why rules of WikiPedia prefer to like you. So this is why im sorry to mess up. Bad Things that i did on Wikipedia: 1.Can only Pitch Perfect 2 cannot be credit on poster. 2.Make mess with you 3.Upload image of poster and cannot help. God if discuss about this 4.It is important that unknown project page can be messing.

You blocked me if i bad things of Wikipedia. LorickIsBoyThatStopDeleted (talk) 04:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply