User talk:Inductiveload

From Wikisource
(Redirected from User talk:InductiveBot)
Jump to: navigation, search

Inductiveload User Area
Main User Page Talk Page Gallery Contributions

Phil Trans - Illuminated Initial - W.pngELCOME to my user talk page. Feel free to leave me a message if there is a problem or you would like my help, or anything else.

I am also active on Commons. If you would like help with a file I uploaded or would like me to make a file for you, please ask at my user talk page there. If the request is Wikisource-centred, ask here.

Anything you write on this page will be archived, so please be polite (I will be more amenable then) and don't write anything you will regret later! My purpose here is to make interesting and useful documents open to the public. I am never trying to make trouble, and any problems can almost certainly be resolved quickly and easily if everyone stays calm.

Please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) after your post, and continue conversations where they start.This helps to keep discussions coherent for future readers! If I leave a message on your page, then please reply continue there. My replies to messages on this page will be here.

Older dicussions from this page are stored in archives. Especially interesting or detailed topics are kept in sub-archives. Below is a list of all archives and sub-archives:
Wikisource user page Commons user page Wikibooks user page Wikipedia user page

TUSC token 918678eb806b340b1408614584aaa822[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Regarding wikiheaders and anchors[edit]

Hi! I saw your recent edit to Author:Guangxu, and thought you might benefit from knowing that wiki-headers inside equal signs (e.g. "===Imperial Decrees===") can already automatically be used as anchors, so you don't need to also add an {{anchor}} after it. Just FYI :) —Beleg Tâl (talk) 14:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the attention and the info. My thinking was it's easy for someone to change (or remove) a ===header=== without knowing they'll break an anchored link (especially as What links here] doesn't show the anchor on any incoming links, in this case, Author:Cixi. (I hope) it's less likely anyone will change an explicit {{anchor}} without a second thought about breaking incoming links. Probably it's less of an issue in the Page/Main namespaces, where the works generally "freeze" on completion and have few authors who set it up "just so", compared to Portal/Author, where the pages are in a state of continuous flux. Or, perhaps, I'm just paranoid! Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 14:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome back[edit]

The title says it all. — Ineuw talk 09:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

PDF to djvu[edit]

Hi, do you know what the best PDF to djvu converter is, one that will preserve the OCR text? Thanks. Samiur Rahman 2017 (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

What are you trying to achieve with PDF->DjVu conversion? PDFs are already compressed - you're unlikely to get better compression by re-compressing already-compressed data with a different algorithm. I tried pdf2djvu - it inflated a Google Books scan by around 3 times. You can use PDFs and their text layers at Wikisource just the same as DjVu. Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 22:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Collected Papers on Analytical Psychology as new text?[edit]

Hello. I noticed Jung's Collected Papers on Analytical Psychology was added to New texts, but it isn't yet completely proofread. Merely wondering. Londonjackbooks (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

The non-proofread bits do actually appear to be proofread, including italics and even author links, but the original contributor left a lot of it red. I'm going to go through it again, but as far as I'm aware, it's "complete". Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 00:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
The Index is still redlinked, and looks like it needs a Mainspace page. If the pages have been 'proofread', should they not then all be advanced to yellow so it can be marked as a proofread index? IMO it is not yet complete otherwise, despite appearances. Londonjackbooks (talk) 00:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
To be quite honest, I wasn't planning on the index at all, as I just don't see the point of transcribing hundreds of lines of index when we have a search engine. I'll advance the red pages. Feel free to remove from new texts if you're not happy with it being there now. Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 00:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Also IMO, I believe an index to be an integral part of the original text and should be proofread in order to advance a work. I will inquire to see if there are any express WS guidelines to the contrary. Thanks, Londonjackbooks (talk) 01:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Never mind, I'll just remove it from new texts. I only wanted to fix the images originally anyway! Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 01:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
No problem. Sorry to be a busy-body about it! Londonjackbooks (talk) 01:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Well, you're the admin these days, not me! ;-) Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 01:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for reminding me ;) Wasn't really acting in that capacity :) Came across it for other reasons. Londonjackbooks (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations, by the way, I wasn't around when it happened! Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 01:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. It may take me another 7 years before I am comfortable/confident as such. I perform basic tasks. Welcome back, by the way! Londonjackbooks (talk) 01:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

A personal "next" project under consideration:[edit]

I was pleased to see your edit of one of my pages. I had the impression you had chosen to stay away. We have not communicated since I discovered 35 additional small works of Ferrier. Currently, I have begun preparatory measures as if to fully publish the 1876 Edition of The Imperial Dictionary of Universal Biography... in which those Ferrier pieces were found. I will not involve you if that's your preference. I would prefer to ask for your guidance.Klarm768 (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi again :-) I've been annoyingly busy in real life (and I will sadly soon be so again). I'm just trolling around on WS for a bit and mixing looking around with my long term ongoing work (which gets a little dry sometimes). IDUB looks like a fairly major undertaking - you could ask on the Scriptorium if you'd like help with it, I'm afraid I can't commit to anything. The people who do things like the DNB or even EB1911 might be interested? Inductiveloadtalk/contribs 17:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I never learned to be a team player. You are surely aware that I was poorly instructed since my Ferrier pages do not "align to existing styles." I am accustomed to to learn that no one would care to join my ill-conceived vocations. For this project, I am considering assorted strategies. I prefer guidance from (a) knowledgeable individual(s). Nevertheless, I will implement a course of action. Eventually someone may inform me that my work does not "align to existing styles," and she will soft-redirect two of the then-already-published-four-thousand pages... making an ass of herself and her own criticism. Recent Scriptorium advice is a few light-years in arrears of my own efforts and not encouraging as a resource. Klarm768 (talk) 05:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)