Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/Xxagile

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
Warning Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive collecting requests for restricted access by Xxagile. See current discussion or the archives index.

2010-02 admin[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Promoted
Xxagile (talkcontribs) • SULYAECenWS activityGlobal

I would like to nominate Xxagile for adminship. Xxagile has been with us for eighteen months, and has built up a significant number of edits through the site within that time, and significantly contributed through the Page: namespace assisting in many general works, and especially enthusiastically with collaborate works like Proofread of the Month. While I would say Xxagile is one of our quieter achievers, they also work on the patrolling and regularly discovers abuse, undoes it and reports it to WS:AN. For their work in reverting edits and blocking abuse, I feel that the granting of administrative tools would be beneficial to the project. FWIW Xxagile seems to have a like for the poetry, and despite that I am still supporting them for adminship <vbg>. billinghurst sDrewth 04:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Acceptance:Thank you for the nomination Billinghurst, I accept. Thanks to all who have voted so far, I appreciate the support. --Xxagile (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support as per nom billinghurst sDrewth 04:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support per like of poetry (:P) plus a lot of other major pluses - a definite benefit to the project. Ottava Rima (talk) 05:03, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support --John Vandenberg (chat) 14:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support, a poetry fan eh? Maybe now someone will get around to adding and populating Author:Vachel Lindsay, which I've been vaguely intending to do for a while, but I've been too busy with Celtic languages. Angr 15:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support. Dovi (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support, only because I'm a whore and he worked on my Documents from the Den of Espionage file for me :D Sherurcij Collaboration of the Week: Author:Thomas Carlyle. 18:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support, seems like this is your favorite wiki and you have done lots of good work. Jeepday (talk) 00:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support I see a lot of great work in the past and even more great work to come in future! Total support. --Mattwj2002 (talk) 06:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Support; looks good. --Spangineerwp (háblame) 15:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promoted.Zhaladshar (Talk) 02:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Late support for the record. Moondyne (talk) 04:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

2011-03 confirmation[edit]

Administrator since February 2010 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions, logs, crosswiki). Xxagile will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger an election with decision by simple majority.
confirmed Billinghurst (talk) 09:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

2012-04 confirmation[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Not confirmed
Administrator since February 2010 (see previous discussions), currently inactive (contributions, logs, crosswiki). Xxagile will be removed automatically unless a simple majority of established users support continued access.
Note: No edits here since 20 July 2011, nor on any Wikimedia Foundation project since 10 October 2011. Hesperian 11:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Remove — for inactivity. Restoration should not be an issue in case of return. -- George Orwell III (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Although removal is automatic a simple majority can overcome it, so I am commenting just in case. Concur with GO3, per inactivity policy, although I withhold judgement on any future restoration as I don't believe I'm very familiar with Xxagile.--Doug.(talk contribs) 15:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Unbit :-( — billinghurst sDrewth 17:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Remove --Spangineer (háblame) 19:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Remove, per George Orwell III. --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Remove tools at this time. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 09:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment—I don't have enough experience 'working' with Xxagile to cast a vote one way or the other. AKA Londonjackbooks 16:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


Not confirmed. Removal of access requested[1] and fulfilled.[2] Hesperian 00:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC)