Does Price Fixing Destroy Liberty?/Annotated/Glossary

• Adams vs. Tanner, 244 U. S. 590. 1917, 58
• Ashby vs. White, 2 Ld. Reym. (1703), 163
• Atkins vs. The Fiber Disintegrating Company, 18 Wall. 272. 1874, 44
• barter, 8
• Barnardiston vs. Soame (1674), 6 How. St. Tr. 1096, 159
• Blackburn, Colin (Lord Blackburn), 163
• Bowen, Charles Synge Christopher, 86
• Bramwell, Lord (see Wilshere, George William)
• Brandeis, Louis Dembitz, 67
• Branson vs. Bush, 251 U. S. 182. 1919, 56
• Brewer, David Josiah, 45
• Byron, George Gordon, 157
• Canute, King (Cnut the Great), 86
• Chicago R. R. Co., etc., vs. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226. 1897, 56
• City of Knoxville vs. The Knoxville Water Company, 212 U. S. 1. 1909, 20
• Civil Law (as branch of Common law), 7
• Clayton Antitrust Act, 40
• Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Paul Railway Company vs. Backus, 154 U. S. 439. 1894, 134
• Coke, Edward (Lord Coke, pronounced "Cook"), 16
• Coke on Littleton, 13
• Collins vs. Kentucky, 234 U.S. 634, 1914, 19
• commodities, 8
• Common Law, 11
• Communism, 55
• Conner, Henry Groves, 72
• Connolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 U. S. 540, 1902, 52
• Coolidge, Calvin, 162
• Court of equity, 23
• Craig vs. Missouri, 4 Peters 409. 1830, 14
• Cromwell, Oliver, 7
• Day vs. Savage, Hob. 85-87 (1614), 162
• decreasing returns, Law of (Diminishing returns), 92
• Dundreary, Lord, 39
• Elementary Economics (Ely & Wicker, Revised 1919 edition), 121
• Elements of Economics (Macleod, 1881), 161
• Ely, Richard T., 119
• Ex parte Milligan, 4 Wall. 2. 1866, 76
• Exchange (New York Stock Exchange)^[1], 29
• Faris, Charles Breckenridge, 72
• Fisher, Irving, 9
• Fox vs. State of Washington, 236 U. S. 273. 1915, 139
• Free Silver (free coinage of silver), 60
• Fry, Lord Justice (Edward Fry), 87
• Fuller, Melville (Chief Justice Fuller), 149
• George, Henry, 60
• Giffard, Hardinge Stanley (Lord Chancellor Halsbury), 88
• guild, 14
• Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company vs. Texas Packing Company, 244 U. S. 31. 1917, 45
• Halsbury, Lord Chancellor (see Giffard, Hardinge Stanley)
• Hamilton vs. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co., 251 U. S. 146. December 15, 1919, 77
• Hampden, John, 7
• Harlan, John Marshall (Mr. Justice Harlan), 149
• Harrison vs. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, 232 U. S. 318. 1914, 146
• Hazel, John Raymond, 72
• Hepburn Act, Commodities Clause of, 40
• Hobart, Sir Henry (Lord Chief Justice), 162
• Hollander, Jacob H., 104
• Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr., 8
• Holt, John (Lord Chief Justice Holt), 163
• Hoover, Herbert, 130
• Hopkins vs. Lee, 6 Wheat, 109. 1821, 45
• Hough, Charles Merrill, 54
• "How Inflation Touches Every Man's Pocketbook.", by Jacob H. Hollander (New York Times, 2 May 1920), 105
• Hughes, Charles Evans, 84
• injunction, 23
• International Harvester Company of America vs. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 216. 1914, 8
• International Harvester Co. vs. Missouri, 234 U. S. 199, 54
• Interstate Commerce Commission, 71
• Introduction to Economics (Turner, 1919), 121
• Jefferson, Thomas, 151
• Knowlton et al. vs. Moore, 178 U. S. 41, 13
• Laughlin, James Laurence, 59
• Lever Act, 7
• Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Company vs. City of Lincoln, 250 U. S. 256. 1919, 24
• Loan Assn. vs. Topeka, 20 Wall. 655. 1875, 57
• Lockwood, Stephen T., 72
• Loewe vs. Lawlor, 208 U. S. 274. 1908, 150
• Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company vs. United States, 238 U. S. 1. 1915, 23
• MacLeod, Henry Dunning, 161
• McFarland vs. American Sugar Refining Co., 241 U. S. 79. 1916, 53
• McKenna, Joseph, 19
• McReynolds, James Clark (Justice McReynolds), 68
• Magna Charta, 14
• Malone vs. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 639. 1914, 84
• Manton, Martin Thomas, 54
• Mather & Co.^[2] 142
• Mellor, John (Judge Mellor), 165
• mercantile system (Mercantilism), 8
• Mill, John Stuart, 34
• Miller vs. Strahl, 239 U. S. 426. 1915, 139
• Miller, Samuel Freeman, 57
• Mogul Steamship Co. vs. McGregor (1892), 41
• Money and Prices (Laughlin, 1919), 59
• Monongahela Navigation Company vs. United States, 148 U. S. 312. 1893, 133
• monopoly, 14
• Nash, Edmund S., 80
• Nash vs. United States, 229 U. S. 373. 1913, 8
• National Cotton Oil vs. Texas, 197 U. S. 115. 1905, 107
• New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Co. vs. Estill, 147 U. S. 591. 1893, 45
• nonsequitor, 171
• Nordenfelt vs. Maxim, 1894 A. C. 559. 1894, 149
• North, Francis (Chief Justice), 159
• Northern Pacific Railway Company vs. North Dakota, 236 U. S. 584^[3]. 1915, 23
• Northern Securities Co. vs. United States, 193 U. S. 197. 1904, 8
• Ohio, etc., Water Co., vs. Ben Avon Borough, 253 U. S. 287. 1920, 67
• Oklahoma Operating Co. vs. Love, 252 U. S. 331. 1920, 67
• Omaha vs. Omaha Water Co., 218 U. S. 180. 1910, 123
• Outlines of Economics (Ely, 1893), 119
• Peckham, Rufus Wheeler, 22
• Physiocrat, 161
• Pollock vs. The Farmers' Loan & Trust Company, 157 U.S. 429. 1895, 14
• price fixing, 14
• Prigg vs. Pennsylvania, 16 Peters 539. 1842, 136
• Principles of Economics (Taussig, 1911), 120
• Principles of Political Economy (Mill, 1848), 34
• profiteering, 10
• Progress and Poverty (George, 1879), 60
• Public Service Company Law of Pennsylvania (Section 31), 68
• Repeal of Certain Laws Act (1772), 88
• Rhode Island vs. Massachusetts, 12 Peters 657. 1838, 14
• Roberts vs. Benjamin, 124 U. S. 64. 1888, 45
• Rudkin, Frank H., 72
• scarcity, 17
• Scrutton, Thomas Edward (Lord Justice Scrutton), 167
• Secundino Omaechevarri vs. Idaho, 246 U. S. 343. 1918, 140
• Sherman Antitrust Act, 40
• Smith, Adam, 10
• Smith vs. Texas, 233 U. S. 630. 1914, 57
• Socialism, 60
• Spalding vs. Vilas, 161 U. S. 483. 1896, 164
• Sparf vs. United States, 156 U. S. 51. 1895, 71
• Sphinx, as daughter of Orthus (or, Orthrus), 167
• Stabilizing the Dollar (1920) by Irving Fisher, 103
• Standard Oil Company of New Jersey vs. United States, 221 U. S. 1. 1911, 14
• Statute of Monopolies (Statute of James I), 14
• Supply and demand, 91
• Taussig, F. W., 120
• Trade Association, 14
• Turner, John Roscoe, 121
• turnover, 94
• United States Court of Appeals (Second Circuit), 54
• United States vs. American Tobacco Company, 221 U. S. 106. 1911, 43
• United States vs. Brewer, 139 U. S. 278. 1891, 170
• United States vs. L. Cohen Grocer Company, 264 Fed. Rep. 218, 1920, 72 ^[4]
• United States vs. Colgate, 250 U. S. 300. 1919, 101
• United States vs. Delaware & Hudson Company, 213 U. S. 366, 1909, 44
• United States vs. Knight, 156 U.S. 1. 1895, 14
• United States vs. Myatt, 264 Fed. Rep. 442, 1920, 33
• United States vs. Patten, 226 U. S. 525. 1913, 155
• United States vs. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., Collins vs. Kentucky, 242 U. S. 208. 1916, 19
• United States vs. Reading Company, 226 U. S. 324. 1912, 98
• United States vs. Schraders' Sons, Inc., 252 U. S. 85. Decided March 1st, 1920, 102
• United States vs. Sharp, Pet. C. C. 118, 170
• United States vs. Spokane Dry Goods Company, 264 Fed. Rep. 209, 1920, 72
• United States vs. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn., 166 U. S. 290. 1897, 125
• United States vs. Union Pacific R. R. Co., 226 U. S. 61. 1912, 98
• United States vs. U. S. Steel Corporation, 251 U.S. 417. March 1, 1920, 19
• Van Devanter, Justice, 98
• Waddill, Judge (Edmund Waddill), 101
• Wadley Southern Railway Company vs. Georgia, 235 U. S. 651. 1915, 146
• Ward, Henry G., 73
• Washington, Bushrod (Mr. Justice Washington), 170
• Washington, George, 15
• Washington vs. Miller, 235 U. S. 422. 1914, 44
• Wealth of Nations, The (Adam Smith), 15
• Weed & Company vs. Lockwood, 264 Fed. Rep. 453, 1920, 54
• Western Union Telegraph Co. vs. Hall, 124 U. S. 444. 1888, 45
• White, Edward Douglass, 39
• Whitwell vs. Continental Tobacco Co., 125 Fed. Rep. 454, 1903, 99
• Wicker, George Ray, 121
• Wilcox vs. Consolidated Gas Company, 212 U. S. 19. 1909, 22
• Wilder Mfg. Co. vs. Corn Products Refining Co., 236 U. S. 165. 1915, 39
• Wilshere, George William (Lord Bramwell), 88
• Wilson, Woodrow, 26

---

1. Earle is referring to the New York Stock Exchange when he writes of "the Exchange."
2. President of Mather & Co. at this time was Charles Elmer Mather. Mather's son, Victor Charles Mather, was married to George H. Earle Jr.'s daughter, Catharine Ann Earle.
3. listed on WS as 585; it is a typo (I believe) in the Earle text
4. Later appealed to the Supreme Court, see United States v. Cohen Grocery Company, 255 U. S. 81. 1921.