User talk:Cynthiacaty

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Collaboration of the Week

The current community collaboration is collecting works related to
the Eminent Women Series.

Last collaboration: Slavery in the United States (1837)

The current Proofread of the Month is

The Tower  (1928)
by William Butler Yeats.

Last month completed: Memoirs of the Lady Hester Stanhope
The next scheduled collaboration will begin in May.

Welcome to Wikisource!
Now that you're here, you're probably wondering...

Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikisource; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. We are a small community of approximately a hundred key people, with infinite help from random passersby. You might be wondering which of the two classes we consider you...well, I guess that's going to be up to you.

You'll find we are own our little corner of the Wikimedia Foundation, free from all the drama, arguments and policy violations you may be used to seeing elsewhere. In fact, since we largely just republish exactly what others before us have already written, there is very little concern about "neutrality" for example. After all, if the text of a speech by Adolf Hitler is inflammatory and biased...wasn't that its purpose?

If you're looking for a specific topic, you'll likely find it by navigating through Wikisource:Works, whether it's Portal:Islam or Portal:Mermaids. For overarching categories, you might be better looking at something like Category:Poems or Category:Novels. Of course, if you know the author's name, that's easiest of all, just plug in "Author:Rudyard Kipling" and you'll see everything he ever wrote (or was written about him!).

Chances are, you have a favourite subject we don't cover very well...here's how to change that!

So, your favourite author or subject isn't very well represented on the project? Well as long as you make sure the texts fit the standards of Public Domain, you can add them yourself! (Like all rules, those are basic guidelines, if you want to play with exceptions to the rule, just ask any of the administrators for help)

If the text doesn't already exist, just enter its name below and it will pre-load an editing page for you to set to work! Be sure to add {{no header}} to the top of the page, and then include categories so people can find it.


If you can't think of any particular corners to improve on Wikisource, how about taking a look at Portal:Religious texts, Portal:Wars or Portal:Texts by Country for some ideas? Don't forget to list your contributions on those pages as well so others will find and read them in the future!

Reading when you want, how you want
Places to go, people to meet

Well, if you've clicked all the way to this tab, you might as well plan on spending a few more hours acquainting yourself with our massive library. It's not perfect, sometimes there's an occasional misspelling or you'll see a text sorted incorrectly. So help us out, let us know, or fix it yourself!

If you're bored and just wanting to grab a mop and bucket, then there are plenty of corners that need tidying. Works that need to be split into chapters, Works that need their licensing clarified, Works that need machine-read words corrected, Works that need page-numbers removed and Authors whose full names we don't know would all be a great place to start!

Help us out

Yann (talk) 11:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gday. I have reverted the changes that you made to Riches as I am not sure what you were trying to achieve. If Blake wrote a poem called Riches then what would do is to move the existing page to Riches (Teasdale) and make the existing page a disambiguation page, an example is Nurse's Song. If you need some help, please do not hesitate to ask at Scriptorium or my help page. -- billinghurst (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Works named in quotations[edit]

Hi again. You have added works and their names have double quotations in the names themselves. Did the actual works have the double quotations, clearly and specifically, whereas other works did not? Generally we would only include dqs if they are clearly required as part of the name of the poem or work. Thanks. -- billinghurst (talk) 06:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of the works from Blake didn't have titles. Therefore, people usually use the first line of the poem as the so-called title to identify each of them. To prevent others mix them up with those titled poems, the double quotations can show people that those poems were untitled poems. Cynthiacaty (talk) 09:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions[edit]

As I am a dummy of PC, if you are watching this page, please help me to get out of the following problems:

  • How can I use user talk page to talk with(or leave comments to)someone on Wikisource directly?
Best place to learn about talk pages is at m:Help:Talk page. If someone is watching your user talk page, they will see that it has changed, though may or may not go and read your message. If you leave a message on someone's talk page, they should see it and respond (if active). If it is a general question, then they can be asked to the community at Wikisource:Scriptorium.
  • How to make a content table?
If you use headings (see Wikipedia:How to edit a page, they will automatically appear as your page grows.
  • ...
An ellipsis smiley Oh and an asterisk (*) at the start of a line gives you a dot point.

Thanks!

No probs! -- billinghurst (talk) 08:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey~ I made TOC successfully~ Thanks for your guiding!!(Wow, I know how to use the talk page^^)Cynthiacaty (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved Milton: a Poem[edit]

For substantive works, we look to have works have a main page, and subpages. I have rejigged Milton: a Poem to how we structure a work, and note the relative links. Happy to answer questions or explain why we do it this way. -- billinghurst (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One of our colleagues has poked me in the ribs about the move to subpages, so I will await his greater poetry expertise. Sit tight. -- billinghurst (talk) 12:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An exaggeration, and I will have to look at it later. Thanks for your work on it, a valuable contribution, don't let my ponderings distract you. By the way, what source did you use? We can add that info for the real scholars. Cygnis insignis (talk) 13:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I got the source from a book in my public library called Selected Poems from William Blake, which is published by Everyman in 1982 and edited by P.H. Butter(ISBN 0460870688). As I know that Blake's work is in PD now, do I still need to add a reference on each work?? And thanks for your consideration :)Cynthiacaty (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Milton: a Poem I moved it again to Milton (Blake), for the moment, but I'm still working on a permanent name. The name is somewhat ambiguous, see Milton. Please pardon the shuffling, Cygnis insignis (talk) 20:00, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]