Wikisource:Proposed deletions/Archives/2014-01
|
Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in , although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index. |
Kept
Deleted
The following discussion is closed:
Deleted
Typo in category's name. Correct category created, pages moved. Captain Nemo (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2013 (UTC).
- Speedied as G4 redundant to the correct spelling. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 06:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed:
Deleted
I'm not sure where this page is going, but I suspect that it will be out of scope per What Wikisource Includes. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 06:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete - Seven days later and it has gone no further. Wouldn't matter; its not PD as far as I can tell. -- George Orwell III (talk) 00:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 12:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed:
Speed Delete G7. Jeepday (talk) 11:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused and somewhat out of scope for this project (for scope, see Wikisource:Image use guidelines). Old, been stale since the 2007 upload so hopefully whatever issue there existed is now solved, and uploader has indicated agreement to deletion. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed:
Speedy Deleted. -- George Orwell III (talk) 14:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Propose to delete this soft redirect.— Ineuw talk 05:23, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed:
work has been migrated to oldwikisource/Khmer so speedied
Out of scope. Hesperian 01:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've pointed the contributor to the Khmer domain on oldwikisource and asked them to let me know when they had completed transferring across, so that I could then delete the work and it's various linked pages. I'll check shortly where progress is at. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 02:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Roger that, glad to see the contributor is being supported. Hesperian 02:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed:
Deleted. Could have been MOVED or SPEEDY'd. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Please delete, I created this by mistake, there is a typo. -Pete (talk) 18:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed:
speedy delete, transwiki'd (equivalent), files are available at Commons under same filenames
- File:100%.png
- File:100%.svg
- File:25%.svg
- File:25%.png
- File:50%.svg
- File:50%.png
- File:75%.svg
- File:75%.png
Defunct redirects overlapping Commons files to a now-historical page Wikisource:Text quality. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by your nomination. These files are heavily used. I think the intent was to make sure that local copies of the files existed, as they are internally used markers rather than general MediaWiki files. --EncycloPetey (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- No, if there was a locally uploaded copy of the file it would not display "This file is from Wikimedia Commons." I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but deleting the file pages listed merely deletes the #redirect [[Wikisource:Text quality]] that is currently covering the file. The file itself will be untouched as it's taken from Wikimedia Commons. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 06:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- That's right; the images themselves are already at Commons. What we need to delete here is extraneous text on the pages that isn't doing any good. Delete. Angr 08:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- No, if there was a locally uploaded copy of the file it would not display "This file is from Wikimedia Commons." I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but deleting the file pages listed merely deletes the #redirect [[Wikisource:Text quality]] that is currently covering the file. The file itself will be untouched as it's taken from Wikimedia Commons. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 06:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
speedy delete — billinghurst sDrewth 10:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Other
No indication that works anthologised are out of copyright, therefore as little work has been done on transcribing this, it should be deleted unless it can be positively confirmed that all works in it are free from copyright restrictions.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Move from Commons to Wikisource: As I noted at WS:CV, these works are all pre-1923 so copyright-free in the U.S. However, Commons rules dictate that works not copyright-free in their own country of publication should not be stored there. But that doesn't mean we can't store the scans at Wikisource itself.
- Work is already local, and date of publication is 1918. (So PD-US-1923 abroad according to comments made else where), proposed deletion withdrawnpending investigation of individuals works by a third party.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)