Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/Billinghurst

From Wikisource

Jump to: navigation, search
Warning Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive collecting requests for restricted access by Billinghurst. See current discussion or the archives index.

Contents

[edit] Billinghurst

[edit] 2009-01 admin

Billinghurst (talk • contribs) SUL - SQL

I keep seeing this editor making valuable contributions to Wikisource. Recently they have been making more edits to JVbot patrol whitelist then John. Billinghurst has been a contributor to WS since July 2008 with a steady edit history and increasing taking responsibility for higher level participation in the project to include requests for speedy delete and page moves as in this recent edit. I believe granting the tools to this editor would benefit their ability to contribute to the project. I believe this editor has an edit history that shows they are and will continue to be a trusted member of the community. Please join me in supporting Billinghurst as a candidate to Adminship. Jeepday (talk) 13:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I accept the nomination (which I note is the convention), and thank those who have that confidence in me. -- billinghurst (talk) 00:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support As Nom Jeepday (talk) 13:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - Excellent contributor. Suicidalhamster (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. This adminship is long overdue. John Vandenberg (chat) 00:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. Hesperian 02:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. Admin tools can help Billinghurst for his very efficient work. ---Zyephyrus (talk) 09:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support; his record looks good to me. --Spangineerwp (háblame) 17:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Yann (talk) 10:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support AllanHainey (talk) 12:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Thank you for volunteering to do more work. :-) FloNight (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support My only complaint is we can't clone him....we need more people like him on the project. He is very motivated and good worker. He would make a great admin. --Mattwj2002 (talk) 11:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support, of course. Jude (talk) 11:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - thank you for volunteering to help out in this added capacity. Cirt (talk) 18:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support (with chance of opposing confirmation if I remember earlier disputes!); he's done great work adopting Wikisource:Obituaries and hasn't proposed anything too radical that I can recall; seems to be here for the long term. Sherurcij Collaboration of the Week: Author:Bahá'u'lláh. 01:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - very active. Good work thus far. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support.--GrafZahl (talk) 10:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Appointed per consensus--BirgitteSB 01:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] 2009-09 checkuser

Preconditions


I would like to propose myself to become a third CheckUser for English Wikisource. I meet the Meta criteria expressed and am willing to identify myself to WMF. I have read and understand the existing policies at Meta and enWS, and agree to abide by the policies. I have no experience on a wiki as a checkuser, though I offer my time at RootsWeb as postmaster and listmaster as an example to demonstrate my skills and knowledge of IP addresses, IP address ranges, and rDNS. I hasten slowly in my admin approach, and would continue to be cautious, consultative, and patient. -- billinghurst (talk) 11:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

  1. Support. If we need another Checkuser, then it might as well be Billinghurst. Hesperian 13:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  2. Support. I believe technical qualifications aren't the key point, since the network material is something others with the tools pass on. No reservations about the "invisibles". Charles Matthews (talk) 16:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  3. Support. He is a wise and trusted admin and I am sure he will make a wise and trusted check user this is why I support him. --Mattwj2002 (talk) 06:22, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
  4. Support. Yes please. We do need another CU here, as I no longer notice problems and even miss requests on WS:AN. John Vandenberg (chat) 10:14, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
  5. Support. Active and trustworthy admin. Yann (talk) 10:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
  6. Support. Valued user to the project and should do fine with this added responsibility as well. Cirt (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
  7. Support. --Zyephyrus (talk) 19:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
  8. Support. --Eliyak T*C 02:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
  9. Support; trustworthy and experienced. --Spangineerwp (háblame) 21:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
  10. Support. A trust-worthy and dedicated user whose use of the tools will be a boon to the community. Jude (talk) 22:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
  11. Support Trusted. My account is new, but it was created on January 2009 here. Pmlineditor  Talk 10:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
  12. Support -- A fine idea; someone willing to do moar work ;) Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:44, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
  13. support - Our current shortage is not a good thing, he seems trustworthy. -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 04:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
  14. Support - Easy decision. This should be closed and forwarded to the Stewards. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
    Comment I believe that we need a minimum of 25 votes to take to stewards. While I wondered whether there could be awareness made to the community, I didn't think that I was the one who should take such an action. billinghurst (talk) 21:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
  15. Support.--Zhaladshar (Talk) 19:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
  16. Support. ResScholar (talk) 06:57, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
  17. Support Cygnis insignis (talk) 08:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
  18. Support 203.49.255.20 00:22, 3 September 2009 Oops, I forgot to sign in. Moondyne (talk) 00:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
  19. Support. No concerns. Suicidalhamster (talk) 09:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
  20. Support. --BirgitteSB 11:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
  21. Support. He's a fine user, and he'll help cover the times John Vandenberg or I are away. --Pathoschild 23:46:54, 08 September 2009 (UTC)
  22. Support. Trusted user. --Shanel (talk) 23:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
  23. Support. user is trusted and hopefully would be great CU on enwikisource , best of luck Mardetanha (talk) 00:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
  24. Per the support of a number of other users I trust including more than one fellow CU and more than one fellow steward. Please take things slowly and ask for help if you need it. Most important: please remember that Pixie dust.png Checkuser is NOT magic pixie dust Pixie dust.png and you will do fine. ++Lar: t/c 00:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
  25. Support I have interacted with the user several times although not here, and he will do just fine at this. --Neskaya (talk) 01:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
  26. Support - very experienced user. --Ixfd64 (talk) 05:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Done. —Pathoschild 20:07:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/Billinghurst"