Wikisource:Administrators
See also:
- Wikisource:Administrators' noticeboard
- System list of administrators / List rights of administrators
- Advanced rights holders' activity
- Admin statistics ()
Current administrators
[edit]Administrators are given access for one year per the Restricted access policy. Regular votes are held to confirm each user's status. Other languages indicate the areas in which the administrators might be able to converse with outside project members, or help provide public domain translations.
Username | Other languages | Next Confirmation | Other access |
---|---|---|---|
BD2412 | French (basic) | 2025-11 | bureaucrat, enwp admin, enwikt admin, enwq admin & crat |
Beeswaxcandle | Music (Lilypond) | 2025-05 | bureaucrat |
Beleg Tâl | French (intermediate), Latin (basic) | 2025-02 | |
Billinghurst | 2025-04 | Interface admin; admin: commons, enWP, meta, mw, global sysop see all | |
CalendulaAsteraceae | Spanish (near-native), Italian (intermediate), French (basic) | 2025-04 | |
Charles Matthews | French (intermediate), Russian (basic) | 2025-10 | enwp admin |
EncycloPetey | Spanish (intermediate), Latin (intermediate), French (basic), German (basic), Ancient Greek (basic) | 2024-10 | enwikt admin, species admin |
Hesperian | 2025-05 | admin@commons, admin@en.wp | |
Hrishikes | Bengali, Hindi, Sanskrit (basic) | 2024-10 | Commons filemover & extended-uploader |
Inductiveload | French (basic), German (intermediate) | 2024-11 | interface admin |
Ineuw | Hungarian (intermediate), Hebrew (intermediate), French (beginner), | 2025-02 | |
Jan.Kamenicek | Czech (native), Slovak (fluent), Russian (basic) | 2025-04 | commons filemover |
Jusjih | Chinese, French (nearly intermediate), Korean (very basic), Japanese (learning) | 2025-02 | mul.ws admin and importer + others see all |
Kathleen.wright5 | 2024-11 | ||
Mahagaja | German (fluent), French (intermediate) | 2024-12 | mul.ws admin |
MarkLSteadman | German (intermediate), French (basic) | 2025-08 | |
Mpaa | Italian | 2025-07 | |
Prosfilaes | Esperanto (basic) | 2025-10 | |
Samwilson | PHP, Javascript, Lua | 2024-12 | WMF staff (as SWilson (WMF)) |
SnowyCinema | Danish (intermediate), Spanish (basic), Tagalog (basic), Python, JavaScript (intermediate) | 2024-12 | |
Xover | Scandinavian languages, general geekery (programming etc.) | 2025-09 | interface administrator |
Zyephyrus | French, Latin, Ancient Greek | 2024-12 | mul.ws bureaucrat |
Confirmation discussions
[edit]Restricted access depends on the continued support of the community. This may be tested by a vote of confidence, in which a simple majority (50%+1) must support the user's continued access for it to be retained. (What access a discussion concerns should be explicitly noted in the discussion's introduction.) Any user may propose a vote of confidence, but at least three established users must support the need for one before it can be called. Such a proposal is made automatically one year after the last scheduled or called proposal (concerning all restricted access).
In the case of an unscheduled (called) proposal, the user may not use the restricted access for any non-trivial action at any time until the vote is closed. A bureaucrat will eventually archive the discussion and, if so decided, request removal of restricted access by a steward.
EncycloPetey
[edit]- Support --Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral. More edit summaries would be much better.--Jusjih (talk) 23:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Hrishikes (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral. @EncycloPetey:, you really need to learn to cool it with the reversions. I'm not the only one to be frustrated by your use of reversion; I have also noticed other complaints on the subject at WS:AN. Although you generally use the "undo" function, which is not governed by policy as the "rollback" function is, I urge you to bear in mind that they both have similar effects on other users, and to take to heart the advice given by WS:AP regarding rollbacks: "it may be aggravating to the affected user if it is used to rollback a legitimate change which the administrator disagrees with. Administrators should avoid rolling back legitimate edits if at all possible." —Beleg Tâl (talk) 18:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for the reasons given by Beleg Tâl above (as well as other occasions I have seen in the past years). Too ill-equipped at dealing with confrontation to be an administrator. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:47, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Hrishikes
[edit]- Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 17:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral. More edit summaries would be much better.--Jusjih (talk) 23:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Alien 3
3 3 09:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Nominations for adminship
[edit]- Older nominations are archived.