Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/Samwilson

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Samwilson[edit]

2016-06 admin[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Successful

Samwilson (talkcontribs) • enWS activityGlobal

I would like to nominate Samwilson to be an administrator at Wikisource. Samwilson is a user of many years, and has contributed diligently, competently and across each of our namespaces. The ethos for enWS in appointing its administrators has been to focus on the characteristics to contribute and to know when and where to contribute, and I believe that Samwilson portrays the characteristics that we desire. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Billinghurst. I accept the nomination; have read Wikisource:Adminship; and if made an Administrator will do my best to further the goals of the project! :-) — Sam Wilson ( TalkContribs ) … 07:47, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Zyephyrus (talk) 21:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for missing many edit summaries. Please improve them.--Jusjih (talk) 02:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
    I'm sorry I don't do more edit summaries. It's just that a lot of my edits are pretty minor typo fixes, and it takes longer to write e.g. "Added missing quotation mark." than it does to do the actual edit. I'll endevour to be more thorough in future though. Is there a policy or help page that mentions best practice in this regard? — Sam Wilson ( TalkContribs ) … 07:47, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
    If edit summaries is the current measure then there are a great number of users, including current admins, who are in trouble. @Samwilson: not really, for the page namespace, I would consider that the proofread or validated flags are sufficient when doing a page in Page: ns, otherwise I put more general statements/keywords like "formatting", template name, etc. I truly want to see edit summaries for complex events, or where something needs explaining, especially with reversions. I cannot say that I have seen a problem with your edits. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
    Thanks. Yes, I certainly agree that good summaries are important for most non-proofreading edits. — Sam Wilson ( TalkContribs ) … 14:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportBeleg Tâl (talk) 13:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The measure of suitability for adminship is, "can they be trusted with the tools"; nothing about this editor's edit summaries, or anything else in their editing history, causes me to doubt that they can be. BD2412 T 16:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMpaa (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportCharles Matthews (talk) 08:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed: Successful. Hesperian 00:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

2017-06 admin[edit]

admin since June 2016 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Samwilson will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

2018-06 confirmation[edit]

Administrator since 2016 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Samwilson will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support BD2412 T 02:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 12:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Supportbillinghurst sDrewth 10:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support C. F. 13:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dick Bos (talk) 13:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. More edit summaries would be much better.--Jusjih (talk) 15:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Ineuw 03:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Artículo bueno.svg Confirmedbillinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 11 July 2018 (UTC)