User talk:Esme Shepherd

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Esme Shepherd, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Carl Spitzweg 021-detail.jpg

You may be interested in participating in

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{CotW}} to your page for current wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Transclusion of Index:Landon in Literary Gazette 1822.pdf[edit]

Hi Esme, do you have plans to transclude this work to the main namespace? If you are wanting assistance for tranclusion, then please ask. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi - I've had a look at this but it instructs me to add a new page and I cannot find how to do this. Where, and how should I name it? Esme Shepherd (talk) 11:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

I have added the title used on the scan that you have, though feel welcome to amend it. From there you can add. Actually I may get one of our resident poetry experts to assist, she is way better on this stuff than me.

@Londonjackbooks: Can you please assist. My looking at the work it looks like individual works as subpages with a created table of contents utilising {{auxiliary Table of Contents}} on the root page. The edition detail that is on the top of each page may be better poked into the header and then utilised in the notes field of each subpage. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: I am giving it a look-through... There might be another option with subpage-creation. I'll get back on this soon... Londonjackbooks (talk) 14:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

The "Index" is actually a TOC, and is labeled "Contents". Most of the "work" is divided up into a series of sketches &c., with occasional poems peppering certain "sections". An alt option for subpages would be to divide/title subpages thusly:

/Song [single poem] @p1
/Poetic Sketches - Series 1 [6 sketches & 4 poems] @p2
/Poetic Sketches - Series 2 [6 sketches] @p19
/Songs [3 poems] @p33
/Sketches ... Dagley [3 sketches] @p36
/Poetical Sketches - Series 3 [6 sketches & 1 poem] @p42
/Dramatic Scenes [2 scenes] @p70
/Fragments in Rhyme [11 fragments & 1 sonnet] @p78

But then we would lose the ability to add edition details for each individual piece in the notes sections. For this reason, I am leaning toward Billinghurst's method, but would like to solicit a third opinion... @Beeswaxcandle:? Londonjackbooks (talk) 16:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Esme, I see you have already begun transclusion... For a Mainspace title, I would follow the title used in the scan as Billinghurst suggested above (Poems in The London Gazette during the year 1822 by Letitia Elizabeth Landon (L. E. L.) the poet everyone is talking about)... modifying that as you see fit, as it is rather long... But ".pdf" need not be in the title for a Mainspace page. I have further opinions, but am reticent to offer them currently. I will leave it to you to seek further inquiry as you see fit. Londonjackbooks (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I am playing it by ear and will post again if I get stuck Esme Shepherd (talk) 17:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Gotcha. Sometimes we learn better that way. Londonjackbooks (talk) 17:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Esme Shepherd (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC) I have transcluded Landon in The Literary Gazette 1822/Poetic Sketches - Sketch Third but the second page is left aligned even though both pages are centred using center block/s and center block/e in Pages and appear correctly centred there. Why is this?

Poem tag needed to be inside {{center block/s}} template on this page. Londonjackbooks (talk) 16:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Also, subpages should have the same base title as the title page Londonjackbooks (talk) 16:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Esme Shepherd (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC) Oh dear - it might be easier to make new header pages at this stage

Move pages rather than convert to a redirect[edit]

As each Wikisource page ha an underlying identifier AND is linked at Wikidata, we would encourage you to move the page, then convert the created redirect into a disambiguation page. Converting an existing page into a redirect causes issues. Also to think about pages on watchlists, etc. Knowledge for next time. :-) Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

  • Esme Shepherd (talk) 21:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC) I was a little worried about this but surely only one page can have any particular name. It would be better if you discouraged editors from using page titles that are NOT UNIQUE to the work they are posting. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by moving a page. Can you explain, please?
    Let me start with the reading material
    • Help:Disambiguation about how we manage works with the same title. Unfortunately it is not possible to preclude any title, so we plan for how we manage this.
    • w:Help:Move WP's nice text on how to do a move ... using the dropdown More > Move.
    Please ping me with questions. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Esme Shepherd (talk) 09:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks, I noticed that disambiguation pages state "If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page." and I was hoping that would solve the issue. I will try your recommended route if the issue arises again. I wasn't expecting to find common titles usurped so frequently.

Yes, we do have legacy issues, and there was an earlier conversation (years ago) about pushing harder for extended titles to a nomenclature, however, it was just going to be doomed to failure, especially when putting in wikilinks in something like DNB. The reference on the disambig page is meant to indicate that you should put the link to where the work is (or might be) hence why we will set up "Dawn (Smith)" and play loose with redirects. There is no perfect way to do this. <shrug> — billinghurst sDrewth 16:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Image issues[edit]

Esme Shepherd (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2017 (UTC) I am in the process of proofreading "Improvisatrice. pdf", which I picked up at page 91 this morning. When I reached page 95, I found no image. The images up to 94 are all present and correct but after that, all the pages show the following message:
Error generating thumbnail:
Error creating thumbnail: Reading profile /etc/firejail/mediawiki-converters.profile Reading profile /etc/firejail/mediawiki-converters.profile �]0;firejail /usr/bin/convert -depth 8 -quality 95 -resize 1240 - /tmp/transform_66e513481da5.jpg �convert: no decode delegate for this image format `' @ error/constitute.c/ReadImage/501. convert: no images defined `/tmp/transform_66e513481da5.jpg' @ error/convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/3210. Parent pid 3374, child pid 3376 Parent is shutting down, bye...
Esme Shepherd (talk) 10:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC) P.S. This has only happened today. Yesterday, all the images were visible. Therefore, it must be some kind of glitch, which hopefully can be resolved.

@Hesperian, @Samwilson: either of you have an opinion worth sharing? Noting that it is Index:Improvisatrice.pdf. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
@Beleg Tâl: and another — billinghurst sDrewth 16:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, @Billinghurst: the problem is already known, I also see it in the yesterday's evening, and Beleg Tâl as well. See the topic on the Scriptorium/Help: Wikisource:Scriptorium/Help#Problems_with_File:Special_301_Report_2014.pdf. And Beleg Tâl kindly assisted with the problem and registered an issue on the Phabricator (as marked on the Scriptorium's Help). Now waiting the solution (maybe it'll come soon). Regards, Nigmont (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes, tracked at task T164045. I just put a note at WS:S as well to make sure people know about it. —Beleg Tâl (talk) 18:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Resolved. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Improvisatrice transclusion[edit]

Hi, I was going through your transclusion. It seems that it does not conform to the convention here. You can compare with other works. For example:

  1. The name of the work, as per title page, is The Improvisatrice and Other Poems; but you have named it Improvisatrice (L. E. L.). I could not understand the reason.
  2. Title, printers, frontispiece, front, title page, advertisement, contents 1, contents 2 — this whole lot should be transcluded together. Is there any reason for separate transclusion, contrary to the custom here?
  3. There is no serial number of the items in the contents portion. Wherefrom did you get those serial numbers?
  4. Was there any reason to split the last stanza (after the rule) of Hindoo Girl's Song and shift it to Indian Bride?
  5. The pdf file itself seems to be artificially created, and not the 1824 version. An 1825 version is available at

Hrishikes (talk) 16:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Esme Shepherd (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

  • My compilation is based on the 1824 edition but to avoid duplication and to direct readers to actual sources, I have not duplicated the poems that are already transcluded from The Literary Gazette. That is why I avoided the actual title. There are, I know, other works entitled The Improvisatrice.
  • I am happy to put all the lead pages together. I wasn't sure about this but I would prefer it anyway.
  • The contents are linked to this volume or to the Literary Gazette collections, as dated.
  • The passage after Hindoo Girl's Song is a linking section, a part of the Improvisatrice's monologue that seems too short to require a separate page. It leads into and announces The Indian Bride, so it surely ought to be included there.

Esme Shepherd (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Would you like me to add an explanatory header. I have provisionally prepared one in Category: Letitia Landon's Poetry.
Duplication of works are found in plenty in this site. They are normally treated as different versions or editions of the same work. Portions are not to be removed from the file. If there is some copyright problem for a particular page, that page can be blackened, but not removed. Even blank pages are not to be removed. As for the name, there may be other works named The Improvisatrice, but is there another work named The Improvisatrice and Other Poems? (the "other poems" portion is not to be ignored). The name in the title page should match the name of the work in the main namespace, except in exceptional cases, where contrary justification exists. Please pick some random works here and go through them, as well as the help pages, for a better understanding of the procedure here. Hrishikes (talk) 14:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Complete source works[edit]

Esme Shepherd (talk) 18:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

  • I have one in hand but have some issues before uploading - The title is incidentally 'The Troubadour; Catalogue of Pictures, and Historical Sketches' and the file will so be named if that is what is required.
  • There are issues with Tables of Contents - try as I will I can find no way of reproducing the columnar format of these tables in Wikisource. I have examined quite a number of cases but none help to reproduce the requisite format in cases such as this. The whole thing seems to be a nightmare.
  • The other issue with the Table of Contents is that the original, which it appears I am required somehow to reproduce, is designed for an in the hand book and is utterly useless as an aid to navigating an electronic book in Wikisource. Have you given any thought to this? Item one - page 1; item two - page 257. Really?
No one has said that you need to reproduce the TOC exactly. But the file should be uploaded as is, without editing the contents of the pages (except in special and justifiable circumstances), so that the original can be verified by any reader from the side-by-side display of scan and transcription. This verifiability is the whole point of our exercise of scan-backed proofreading. Hrishikes (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


Esme Shepherd (talk) 10:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC) I am a little frustrated to find that when using dropinitial decorated capitals in poetry, center block does not work. Lines are split prematurely and the right hand side of the page is never reached. I am therefore forced to inset all lines using gaps and this can go on for pages!

Usually you will get better response at Wikisource:Scriptorium/Help, and it would be useful if you can give examples of pages where you have tried something so others can look directly what you have tried. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

More Image Issues[edit]

Of the 99 images in Fisher's drawing room scrap book Plates, 15 are not showing on the Category page. At first they were also not appearing on pages, but now they are. They do appear when clicked to view. At first, one of the Fisher's drawing room scrap book Signatures was acting in the same way, but this has corrected. Esme Shepherd (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC) I should add that this problem arose sometime yesterday.

I am not sure how anyone would be expected to address such a statement, the information is incomplete, and there are no links. People are unlikely to do the legwork to interpret your question rather than answer it. And again, your user talk page is not the ideal place for the community to respond to questions. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Sorry but this error clearly must relate to the change made in the media viewer and it is hardly likely to be confined to my images alone. Esme Shepherd (talk) 11:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)


Thought that I would point you to {{fqm}}. It may be useful for some of the poetry type work that you have been doing. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Esme Shepherd (talk) 16:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC) Thanks, I think I have used it once, although inset quotes seem to be most usual in the period in which I am working.